Spin 0 Particles: Tachyon & Beyond

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chaos' lil bro Order
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tachyon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of tachyons, specifically their spin characteristics. Tachyons are hypothesized to have a spin of 0, similar to scalar field particles like the Higgs boson, which also possesses spin zero. While tachyons have not been observed, their theoretical implications include breaking Lorentz invariance, particularly when coupled with ordinary matter. The conversation highlights the complexities and unresolved questions surrounding tachyons in string theory and quantum field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tachyons and their theoretical implications in physics
  • Familiarity with scalar field particles and the Higgs boson
  • Knowledge of Lorentz invariance and its significance in physics
  • Basic concepts of string theory and quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and implications of tachyons in string theory
  • Study the role of scalar field particles in quantum field theory
  • Explore the concept of Lorentz invariance and its relevance to particle physics
  • Investigate the Higgs boson and its relationship to spin-0 particles
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, theoretical researchers, and students interested in advanced particle physics, particularly those exploring the implications of tachyons and scalar field particles.

Chaos' lil bro Order
Messages
682
Reaction score
2
The tachyon has a spin of 0, does any other particle have a spin of 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any scalar field particle, like the Higgs, has spin zero. Of course, we've not observed one (yet) so these are hypothetical particles.
 
cristo said:
Any scalar field particle, like the Higgs, has spin zero. Of course, we've not observed one (yet) so these are hypothetical particles.

What is a "scalar field particle"?
 
Chaos' lil bro Order said:
The tachyon has a spin of 0

I have trouble with this. First, nobody has seen a tachyon. Second, a spin-1/2 or spin-1 tachyon is no more and no less likely than a spin-0 tachyon.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
I have trouble with this. First, nobody has seen a tachyon. Second, a spin-1/2 or spin-1 tachyon is no more and no less likely than a spin-0 tachyon.
This I think refers to the tachyon "problem" in string theories, which is the lowest angular momentum particle along the trajectory (so is probably a scalar :rolleyes:).
 
Vanadium 50 said:
I have trouble with this. First, nobody has seen a tachyon. Second, a spin-1/2 or spin-1 tachyon is no more and no less likely than a spin-0 tachyon.

This may be a stupid question, but would a spin 1/2 tachyon break the Lorentz symmetry?
 
Ack. Yes. Stupid questions. Tachyons break Lorentz invariance anyway.

Dammit Ben...THINK!
 
BenTheMan said:
Ack. Yes. Stupid questions. Tachyons break Lorentz invariance anyway.

Dammit Ben...THINK!

Maybe *I* am the one not thinking but I don't see that a tachyon breaks Lorentz invariance. They may give problems with causality and other stuff but I don't think they break Lorentz invariance (if they do, in what way?) For example, if they travel faster than c in one frame, that will be the case in all frames. Maybe I am missing something obvious. I have never worked much with theories with tachyons but I thougth they were always written in a Lorentz inavraint form.
 
You can have as many tachyons in your theory as you like. It's only when you allow them to couple to ordinary matter that all hell breaks loose in your theory. But sterile tachyons are fine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K