Spin 1 Particle in a time dependant magnetic field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a spin-1 particle in a time-dependent magnetic field. Participants are exploring the application of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and the Hamiltonian related to the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the Hamiltonian and its substitution into the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. There are attempts to express the state vector in terms of its coefficients and basis states, along with questions about the proper substitution of the state vector into the equation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the next steps, suggesting that substituting the state vector into the Schrödinger equation can lead to a system of differential equations for the coefficients. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their substitutions and the resulting equations.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some confusion regarding the transition from the abstract state vector notation to its explicit representation in terms of basis states and coefficients. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify these points without reaching a definitive conclusion.

richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1483071_10151813160569290_1331827985_n.jpg

Homework Equations



[tex]\left|\psi ,t\right\rangle=\sum_i c_i(t)e^{-\frac{i E_n t}{\hbar}}\left|n\right\rangle[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm quite lost on how to even start this. I can work out that the hamiltonian is[tex]H(t)=\gamma S_z B(t)[/tex]Then I tried to put that into the time-dependent shrodinger equation. [tex]-i\hbar \frac{d}{dt}\left|\psi(t)\right\rangle=H(t)\left|\psi(t)\right\rangle[/tex]but I am not really sure if this is correct or even how to begin solving this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
richyw said:
I'm quite lost on how to even start this. I can work out that the hamiltonian is[tex]H(t)=\gamma S_z B(t)[/tex]Then I tried to put that into the time-dependent shrodinger equation. [tex]-i\hbar \frac{d}{dt}\left|\psi(t)\right\rangle=H(t)\left|\psi(t)\right\rangle[/tex]but I am not really sure if this is correct or even how to begin solving this.

I think you're on the right track. After substituting the given expression for |ψ(t)> into the Schrödinger equation, you should be able to get a differential equation for each coefficient ci(t).
 
I'm still stuck on this one actually. I don't think I am substituting [itex]\left|\psi ,t \right\rangle[/itex] into the equation properly. How to I get [itex]\psi (t)[/itex] from [itex]\left|\psi ,t \right\rangle[/itex]?
 
wait, can I say[tex]\left| \psi ,t \right\rangle=c_1(t)\left| 1,1 \right\rangle+c_2(t)\left| 1,0 \right\rangle+c_3(t)\left| 1,-1 \right\rangle[/tex][tex]\left| \psi ,t \right\rangle=c_1(t)\left(\begin{matrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{matrix}\right)+c_2(t)\left(\begin{matrix}0 \\ 1 \\ 0\end{matrix}\right)+c_3(t)\left(\begin{matrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{matrix}\right)[/tex][tex]\left| \psi ,t \right\rangle=\left(\begin{matrix} c_1(t) \\ c_2(t) \\ c_3(t)\end{matrix}\right)[/tex]
 
and then [tex]i\hbar\frac{d}{dt}\left| \psi ,t \right\rangle=\gamma B(t) S_z\left| \psi ,t \right\rangle[/tex]
 
[tex]i\hbar \left(\begin{matrix} c'_1(t) \\ c'_2(t) \\ c'_3(t)\end{matrix}\right)=\hbar\gamma B(t)\left(\begin{matrix}1 & 0&0\\0&0&0\\0&0&-1\\\end{matrix}\right)\left(\begin{matrix} c_1(t) \\ c_2(t) \\ c_3(t)\end{matrix}\right)[/tex]
 
and then get [tex]c'_1(t)=-i\gamma B(t) c_1(t)[/tex][tex]c'_2(t)=0[/tex][tex]c'_3(t)=i\gamma B(t) c_3(t)[/tex]
 
Yes, that looks good. Just have to solve each of these equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K