A Spin-One Klein Gordon Equation

Click For Summary
The spin-one Klein-Gordon equation is represented as $(\square - m^2)A^\mu=0$, which describes fields with definite mass. This equation is related to the Proca equation, which is given by $(\square - m^2)A^\mu = \partial^\mu \partial^\nu A_\nu$. The Proca equation incorporates an additional condition, $\partial_\nu A^\nu=0$, to account for the constraints on the vector field. The Klein-Gordon equation serves as the quantum mechanical foundation for fields with mass, aligning with the relation $p^2 + m^2 = 0$. Understanding these equations is crucial for studying spin-one fields in quantum field theory.
Jogging-Joe
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
The spin zero Klein Gordon equation is commonly discussed. How about the spin one Klein Gordon Equation?
What is the spin one Klein Gordon Equation? What is the formula for the conserved current, i.e. the electric current density four-vector?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what do you understand by the spin-one KG equation...
But the KG equation is just ##(\square - m^2)\phi=0##.
So I would say that the KG equation for spin-one is just $$(\square - m^2)A^\mu=0$$
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Gaussian97 said:
I don't know what do you understand by the spin-one KG equation...
But the KG equation is just ##(\square - m^2)\phi=0##.
So I would say that the KG equation for spin-one is just $$(\square - m^2)A^\mu=0$$
Yes, and it's called Proca equation.
 
Well, technically the Proca equation is ##(\square - m^2)A^\mu = \partial^\mu \partial^\nu A_\nu##.
Klein-Gordon equation should (as far as I know), be fulfilled by any field with definite mass, since it's the quantum version of ##p^2 + m^2 = 0##.
To obtain the Proca equation you need the extra condition ##\partial_\nu A^\nu=0##.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
45
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K