Max Compression of Spring with Friction

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum compression of a spring when a block slides along a surface with friction. Initially, the block has a speed of 4 m/s, and the spring constant is 6 N/m. The presence of a rough surface with a coefficient of friction (μk = 0.2) complicates the calculations, leading to confusion about whether friction continues to act when the block reaches the spring. Participants debate the correct application of kinematic equations and energy conservation principles, with some expressing frustration over obtaining imaginary components in their calculations. The final answers vary based on assumptions about friction, with one participant noting a discrepancy with textbook solutions.
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
A child slides a block of mass 2 kg along a slick kitchen floor. If the initial speed is 4m/s and the block hits a spring with spring constant 6 N/m, what is the maximum compression of the spring? What is the result if the block slides across 2m of a rough floor that ha μk = 0.2?


(second part of the problem)

getting to the spring..

vf2=v02+2as

F(friction)=μ(mg) ------------> a=μg

vf2=v02+2(μg)s

vf2= 8.152m/s


at the spring..

vf2=v02+2as

vf2=0

v02=8.152

\SigmaF=F(friction)+F(spring)=-m|μg|-|kx|

a=-|μg|-(|kx|/m)

v02=2(-|μg|-(|kx|/m))s

but when i plug all the numbers in.. i get a quadratic equation and it ends up having an imaginary component because the "b^2" term, within the quadratic formula ends up being less than the "4ac" term. i COULD go through and just solve it.. but i don't know what to do because i don't know what to do with the imaginaries.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
iScience said:
A child slides a block of mass 2 kg along a slick kitchen floor. If the initial speed is 4m/s and the block hits a spring with spring constant 6 N/m, What is the result if the block slides across 2m of a rough floor that ha μk = 0.2?
Is this 2 m stretch of rough surface before it gets to the spring?

getting to the spring..

vf2=v02+2as

F(friction)=μ(mg) ------------> a=μg

vf2=v02+2(μg)s

vf2= 23.848
Do you think the rough surface acts to speed up the block? (Careful with signs!)
 
Doc Al said:
Is this 2 m stretch of rough surface before it gets to the spring?


Do you think the rough surface acts to speed up the block? (Careful with signs!)

oops, i corrected my mistake, but i end up with the same problem. can you point any more errors please
 
iScience said:
oops, i corrected my mistake, but i end up with the same problem. can you point any more errors please
Sure.

iScience said:
at the spring..

vf2=v02+2as
That's a kinematic formula for constant acceleration. Not applicable at the spring, since the force and the acceleration vary. (Think in terms of energy.)
 
so would it be this?

(1/2)mv2=(1/2)kA2+ ∫(μmg)ds

(1/2)mv2=(1/2)kA2+ μmgs

since A=s

(1/2)mv2=(A/2)(kA+μmg)

(1/2)mv2-(1/2)kA2+(1/2)μmgA

?
 
i still get a negative number for the "b2-4ac" term... this is frustrating...
 
iScience said:
i still get a negative number for the "b2-4ac" term... this is frustrating...
I don't see how. Since "a" is negative and "c" is positive.

In any case, are you to assume that the friction still applies once the block reaches the spring? If so, why did they specify 2 m?
 
didn't pay attention to the signs again...

well there was a previous part to this question, i just deleted the first part of the question since i already did it. But i assumed that they meant 2m of rough floor and then some more rough floor during the spring plays in. it wouldn't make sense to me if they made it frictionless right there. plus better practice..
 
the answer in the back of the book 1.1m.. what the heck...
 
  • #10
iScience said:
well there was a previous part to this question, i just deleted the first part of the question since i already did it. But i assumed that they meant 2m of rough floor and then some more rough floor during the spring plays in. it wouldn't make sense to me if they made it frictionless right there. plus better practice..
Sure. Makes sense to me.

(But you shouldn't have to assume. If you want, you can post the entire problem, word for word, if it's not clear enough.)
 
  • #11
i posted the original problem back at the top
 
  • #12
iScience said:
i posted the original problem back at the top
That's ambiguous to me. I would have assumed that it's just a rough patch 2 m wide, then frictionless again. Solve it both ways!
 
  • #13
i've decided i don't like this author ($400 textbook..)
 
  • #14
nope, for the frictionless scenario i get 2. something and with friction present i get 1.7, can't see where my mistake is.
 
  • #15
What textbook are you using?
 
  • #16
"Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems" by Thornton and Marion fifth edition
 
  • #17
iScience said:
nope, for the frictionless scenario i get 2. something and with friction present i get 1.7, can't see where my mistake is.
Check your arithmetic. I just did the frictionless scenario and got about 1.65 m. (I could easily have made an error myself though.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K