Spring Constant - Bungee Jumping

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The spring constant for a bungee cord used in a 65 kg bungee jumper scenario is calculated using two methods. Initially, the jumper's gravitational potential energy at 30 m is equated to elastic potential energy, yielding an incorrect spring constant of 39.2 N/m due to a mass error. The correct approach involves using the equilibrium condition where the gravitational force equals the spring force, resulting in a spring constant of 637 N/m. This highlights the importance of accurately defining variables and understanding equilibrium in physics problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with potential energy equations
  • Knowledge of spring mechanics and Hooke's Law
  • Ability to differentiate between gravitational and elastic potential energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Hooke's Law and its applications in real-world scenarios
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in mechanical systems
  • Explore the dynamics of oscillatory motion and spring systems
  • Investigate the effects of mass and displacement on spring constants
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of energy conservation and spring dynamics in practical applications.

Speedking96
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A person with a mass of 65 kg goes bungee jumping. At the lowest point, he is located 30 m below his starting point. If, at the equilibrium point, the bungee cord measures 15m, what is its spring constant?

Homework Equations



F = k*x

Ep = (1/2)(k)(x^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



At the bottom, all the gravitational potential energy is converted to elastic potential energy.

mgh = (1/2)(k)(x^2)
(60 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(30 m) = (1/2)(k)(30^2)

k = 39.2 N/m

I am not sure if this is correct, why did they give the equilibrium information? What does that mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is x in your expression for the bungee cord's potential energy measured relative to?
 
Just because two relevant equations use the same symbol (x here), doesn't mean they refer to the same quantity. Whenever you quote an equation, you ought to state what each symbol represents for that equation.
 
Speedking96 said:

Homework Statement



A person with a mass of 65 kg goes bungee jumping. At the lowest point, he is located 30 m below his starting point. If, at the equilibrium point, the bungee cord measures 15m, what is its spring constant?

Homework Equations



F = k*x

Ep = (1/2)(k)(x^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



At the bottom, all the gravitational potential energy is converted to elastic potential energy.

mgh = (1/2)(k)(x^2)
(60 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(30 m) = (1/2)(k)(30^2)

k = 39.2 N/m

I am not sure if this is correct, why did they give the equilibrium information? What does that mean?
First thing, a typo somewhere: in the problem the mass is 65 kg, but you plugged in 60 kg at the end.

Second, to address your question: in this case equilibrium means that the forces are in balance. That should point you to a slightly easier method of solution.,
 
At equilibrium point, the gravitational force is equal to the force in the spring:

mgh = k x
(65 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(15 m) = (k)(15 m)

k = 637 N/m
 
Speedking96 said:
At the bottom, all the gravitational potential energy is converted to elastic potential energy.

mgh = (1/2)(k)(x^2)
(60 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(30 m) = (1/2)(k)(30^2)

k = 39.2 N/m

I am not sure if this is correct, why did they give the equilibrium information? What does that mean?

You have used incorrect mass .Mass is 65 kg .While using (1/2)kx2 ,you need to be careful in the sense that 'x' represents the displacement from the unstretched length.

30m is the distance between the topmost and lowest point ,not between the lowest point and the equilibrium position .

Speedking96 said:
At equilibrium point, the gravitational force is equal to the force in the spring:

mgh = k x
(65 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(15 m) = (k)(15 m)

k = 637 N/m

Wrong.

How can you equate mgh i.e energy with 'kx' i.e force ?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
44
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
1K