Spring Constant off by a factor of two

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancy in calculating the spring constant using Hooke's Law during a lab experiment involving a spring scale and a 100g mass. The participant measured a spring displacement of 0.0047 m and a force of 0.9 N, leading to the conclusion that the spring constant k should be calculated as k=2mg/x instead of the traditional k=mg/x. This adjustment accounts for the inertia of the mass, which causes it to oscillate and effectively double the displacement during the motion. The participant highlights the importance of considering energy loss due to oscillation and friction in real-world applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and its application in calculating spring constants
  • Basic knowledge of mechanics, particularly forces and motion
  • Familiarity with concepts of potential energy and conservation of energy
  • Knowledge of simple harmonic motion and its characteristics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of Hooke's Law and its limitations in real-world scenarios
  • Study the principles of simple harmonic motion and its mathematical representation
  • Explore energy loss mechanisms in oscillatory systems, including damping effects
  • Investigate the relationship between mass, spring constant, and oscillation frequency
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, laboratory technicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of spring dynamics and energy conservation principles in oscillatory systems.

rakbarut
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Spring Constant off by a factor of two!

Hey everyone, I am doing a lab in which the objective is to find the spring constant of a spring scale, however when doing my calculations, the number I got was off by a factor of two from the supposed answer calculated from Hooke's Law. Here's how I did it...

So we have a spring scale, a 100g mass, and a meter stick. I attached the spring scale to the wall so it was secure and free to be used. I added the 100g mass and measured both the spring displacement and the force. I got x=.0047 m and F=0.9 N. So by using the law of conservation of energy, and setting the maximum stretch of the spring as my zero, I found that...

mgx=1/2kx^2 since all the grav. potential energy got converted to elastic potential energy.

However, manipulating the problem yields k=2mg/x, not k=mg/x as Hooke's Law proposes...

Please any help would be much appreciated! (I under a time crunch as well!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Actually, if you were really watching carefully, you'd see that when the mass had dropped by a distance x, it would also be moving. Its inertia would carry it down by a further distance of x, for a total of 2x, before the spring force was able to stop it. Of course, when it got down to that 2x displacement, there would be an excess upward force on it from the spring, so it would go back up and stop again at its original position, then drop again, etc. etc. etc. (This is called simple harmonic motion, if you want to look up more information about it)

In reality, what happens is that the spring/mass loses some energy (in the form of heat, kind of like friction) every time it goes through this up-and-down oscillation, so it has less energy to move over time and the oscillations get smaller and smaller. Depending on what kind of spring you've got, the time it takes for the oscillations to become so small you can't tell they're there could be very quick, or it could take a long time.
 


mg = 0.1*g =...?
In the case of Hook's law, the work done on the spring is completely stored in the spring as potential energy.
In the given problem, there is a rise in potential energy of the spring and decrease in the of the block. So mg = 1/2*k*x is the correct expression.
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K