1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Spring damper system equation of motion

  1. Nov 16, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A 10 kg block is displaced 20 mm and released. If damping coefficient is 100 N.s/m,
    how many cycles will be executed before amplitude is reduced to 1 mm or below? The stiffness
    of the spring is k=20000 N/m.

    f0zs77.png

    2. Relevant equations


    3. The attempt at a solution
    I first moved the mass to the inner radius and equated the Kinetic Energy of the system.
    Ke1 = Ke2
    Where i found m2 is 4m1

    Next i equated the kinetic energy of the system and equated that to :
    [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]*m[itex]_{eq}[/itex]*v[itex]^{2}[/itex]
    [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]*m[itex]_{2}[/itex]v[itex]^{2}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]I[itex]\frac{V^{2}}{r^{2}}[/itex]= [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]* m[itex]_{eq}[/itex]*v[itex]^{2}[/itex]
    meq = m2 + [itex]\frac{I}{r^{2}}[/itex] where m2is 4*m1

    I then substituted the numbers in and found Meq= 190

    Next to find the amplitude i found the damping ratio of the system
    [itex]\zeta[/itex] =[itex]\frac{c}{Cc}[/itex]

    Cc = 2*m*Wn
    Wn = [itex]\sqrt{\frac{K}{M}}[/itex]
    Wn= [itex]\sqrt{\frac{20000}{190}}[/itex] Wn = 10.26
    Cc = 2(190) * (10.26) = 3899 ∴ [itex]\zeta[/itex] = [itex]\frac{100}{3899}[/itex]
    [itex]\zeta[/itex] = 0.0256
    Under damped system E.O.M =
    X(t) = e[itex]^{-\zeta*W_{n}*t}[/itex] { x[itex]_{o}[/itex]Cos(w[itex]_{d}[/itex]t) + [itex]\frac{x^{.}+W_{n}*X_{0}}{w_{d}}[/itex]*Sin(w[itex]_{d}[/itex]t) }
    I'm trying to find the t value that would make X(t) be less than 1mm, i'm not sure how i would do that without just picking random values of t, as the equation doesn't seem solvable just for t.
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 16, 2013 #2

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    Why did you move the mass to the inner radius and what is m2?
    Anyway:
    Could the Q factor help you there?
     
  4. Nov 16, 2013 #3
    I moved the mass to the inner radius i guess to simplify the system, honestly not sure, its the way I've been taught this semester to do it.

    So if i had the original system the mass would be M1
    But now I've moved it to the inner radius The mass is now M2
    For it to still be the same [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]M1*V1[itex]^{2}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]M2*V2[itex]^{2}[/itex]

    Where V1 = [itex]\dot{\theta}[/itex]2r
    Where V2 = [itex]\dot{\theta}[/itex]r
    Therefore
    [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]M1*([itex]\dot{\theta}[/itex]2r[itex])^{2}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]M2*([itex]\dot{\theta}[/itex]r)[itex]^{2}[/itex]
    Through Cancelling 4M1 = M2

    I'm not sure what the Q factor is
     
  5. Nov 16, 2013 #4

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

  6. Nov 17, 2013 #5
    Still not 100% sure on this Q factor, hard to see how it applies without an example.

    Q = [itex]\frac{1}{2\zeta}[/itex]
    Q = [itex]\frac{1}{2*0.0256}[/itex] Q = 19.53

    Q = 2[itex]\pi[/itex]*[itex]\frac{Energy Stored}{Energy Lost Per Cycle}[/itex]

    [itex]\frac{Q}{2\pi}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{Energy Stored}{Energy Lost Per Cycle}[/itex]

    3.11 = [itex]\frac{Energy Stored}{Energy Lost Per Cycle}[/itex]


    Can you give a hint at what the next step would be, would i find the energy at the start? By using
    T(t) + V(t) = E, Where T is the kinetic energy and V is the potential, i guess at t = 0 there is no kinetic energy.

    Therefore [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]kx[itex]_{0}[/itex][itex]^{2}[/itex] = E(0)
     
  7. Nov 17, 2013 #6

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    How does the energy relate to the amplitude of the oscillations?
     
  8. Nov 18, 2013 #7
    Well as the energy is lost the amplitude decreases starting off at a maximum I guess, so there must be a time where the amount of energy lost means the amplitude falls below 2mm, i mean if I multiply both sides by 3.18 I get that 3.18 x energy lost per cycle = energy stored, at first I thought that meant it oscillates for 3.18 cycles but thst seems too little when the damping is that small. I guess directly the potential energy at the start is converted into kinetic energy so energy is somewhat proportional to velocity squared so if I could find velocity I could find the time through equation of motion.
     
  9. Nov 18, 2013 #8

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    Which means that you need to know how the amplitude related to the energy ... i.e. is it an inverse-square law?

    You can do it more directly using potential energy ... all the kinetic energy ends up stored in the spring, and the energy stored in a spring is related to how far it is compressed ... which is what you want to know about.

    When the amplitude is 2mm, then the system has lost a certain percentage of amplitude ... which relates to a certain percentage of energy, and you have an equation for the rate of energy loss with time.

    You should check the extent of the damping though - is this underdamped, critically damped, what? And what does that mean for the general motion?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Spring damper system equation of motion
Loading...