Spring: does it have mass or is it massless?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mass of a spring in a spring-mass system and its effect on the system's period of motion. The effective mass of the spring is defined as ##\frac{m}{3}##, where ##m## is the actual mass of the spring. The time period of a spring-mass system, considering the spring's mass, is given by the formula $$T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{M+\frac{m}{3}}{k}}$$, where ##M## is the mass of the hanging object and ##k## is the spring constant. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurately calculating the dynamics of spring-mass systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spring-mass systems
  • Familiarity with the formula for the period of oscillation
  • Knowledge of effective mass concepts in physics
  • Basic grasp of wave equations and deformation of materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the effective mass in spring-mass systems
  • Learn about the wave equation and its application to spring deformation
  • Explore the implications of mass distribution in oscillatory systems
  • Investigate the impact of spring constant variations on motion periods
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying dynamics of oscillatory systems will benefit from this discussion.

TjGrinnell
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A spring has a spring constant of 10.0 N/m. I suspend a mass of 0.250 kg from the spring and set it in motion with an amplitude of 3.50 cm. I measure the period of the motion to be 1.15 s.
Is the spring massless? How do you know? If it is not massless, what is its effective mass?
If I suspend a mass of 0.500 kg from the spring and set it in motion with an amplitude of 2.75 cm, what will the period be?
Relevant Equations
F=-kx
T=2pi*sqrt(m/k)
I can easily do the second problem if only I knew the answer to the first. I am just not sure how I would go about figuring out if the spring has mass or not. And if it does, how would I calculate that mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the spring in the question were massless, what would the period of the motion be?
 
  • Like
Likes TjGrinnell
etotheipi said:
If the spring in the question were massless, what would the period of the motion be?
Ok... I was definitely trying to over complicate this. So to get the mass of the spring I would just have to solve for m and subtract the .250 kg mass, is this right? 1.15=2pi*sqrt(m/10)
 
It's the right idea, unfortunately life is a little bit more complicated. The effective mass of a spring-mass system if ##M## is the mass of the hanging object and ##m## is the mass of the spring is ##M + \frac{m}{3}##.

That is to say that the time period of a spring-mass system where the spring has mass ##m## is $$T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{M+\frac{m}{3}}{k}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes TjGrinnell
etotheipi said:
It's the right idea, unfortunately life is a little bit more complicated. The effective mass of a spring-mass system if ##M## is the mass of the hanging object and ##m## is the mass of the spring is ##M + \frac{m}{3}##.

That is to say that the time period of a spring-mass system where the spring has mass ##m## is $$T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{M+\frac{m}{3}}{k}}$$
I see, I really appreciate the help.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
If you're interested, you can find a proof of it here.
 
The analysis in Wiki makes the tacit assumption that the deformation of the spring is homogeneous. Otherwise, the displacement distribution along the spring is much more complicated, and described by the wave equation.
 
  • Informative
Likes etotheipi
So when they ask for the "effective mass", do they want m or m/3 ?
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Merlin3189 said:
So when they ask for the "effective mass", do they want m or m/3 ?

I believe the effective mass of the spring is termed ##\frac{m}{3}##, as opposed to the real mass of the spring ##m##. I suppose you're right in that we could've answered the question without knowing how this term related to the actual mass!

My mistake for not reading the question carefully enough 😁
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189
  • #10
No criticism intended -1 :wink:
I didn't remember the m/3 and had just thought the rest of question might be answered with an additional mass added to the actual mass. I wondered if that's what they meant by effective mass.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
981
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
856
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K