Springs are considered a non-conservative force why is the

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrshappy0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Springs
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
6 replies · 3K views
mrshappy0
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Quick conceptual questions:

Is springs are considered a non-conservative force why is the mechanical energy conserved when a moving object compresses the spring?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This isn't a homework question or anything but I working on a problem that involves a spring and the problem says that a mass horizontally attached to a spring is moving compressed by a bullet being shot into the mass (wood) and that the mechanical energy is conserved during the compression of the spring. Confused.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


mrshappy0 said:
Is springs are considered a non-conservative force why is the mechanical energy conserved when a moving object compresses the spring?
Who said that the spring force is non-conservative?
 


Hmm... Wow.. People troll to much. hah.. So it is conservative.
 


Sure, a spring force is conservative. That's why you can have a spring potential energy function.

But be careful with that 'bullet getting shot into the wood' problem. While the spring compression is conservative, the initial collision of bullet and wood does not conserve kinetic energy: it's an inelastic collision.
 


Right. Potential energy is conserved in inelastic collisions. This allows the use of the potential energy = kinetic energy. THanks Doc!
 


mrshappy0 said:
Potential energy is conserved in inelastic collisions. This allows the use of the potential energy = kinetic energy.
Not exactly! What's conserved in an inelastic collision (and all collisions, actually) is momentum.
 
Oops I meant momentum. Slipped up on my words. To many new concepts flopping around in my word recall section in my brain.