Squaring both sides of equation and inequality?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ArmanZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of squaring both sides of equations and inequalities, particularly focusing on whether it is valid to square an inequality and the conditions under which this might hold true. Participants explore examples and counterexamples, considering both positive and negative numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that squaring both sides of an equation A=B results in A^2=B^2, but questions the validity of this operation for inequalities, specifically when A>B.
  • Another participant provides an example with positive numbers, suggesting that if a and b are both greater than zero, then squaring maintains the inequality (a^2 > b^2) when a > b.
  • Some participants argue that squaring an inequality cannot be universally defined without potentially altering the inequality's nature, citing examples where squaring leads to incorrect results.
  • One participant attempts to clarify their question by discussing the implications of squaring both sides of a false inequality (2>4), leading to confusion about the validity of the operation.
  • Another participant emphasizes that for inequalities, the operations applied to each side cannot be generalized without specific bounds, contrasting this with equalities where operations can be freely applied.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the implications of squaring inequalities, with some correcting misunderstandings about the initial conditions of the inequalities discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether squaring inequalities can be validly applied in all cases. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the conditions under which squaring maintains the inequality.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific cases involving positive and negative numbers, highlighting that the validity of squaring inequalities may depend on the signs of the numbers involved. There is also confusion stemming from incorrect initial assumptions about the inequalities being discussed.

ArmanZ
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What is a square of a number? A^2=A*A. If A=B squaring both sides will give A^2=B^2. How I think about squaring is we multiply both sides of A=B by A(we could also do this for B) we get A*A=B*A but A=B so this will result in A*A=B*B.
But if we do this for an inequality, A>B, multiplying both sides by A will yield two scenarios(when A>0 and A<0) A*A>B*A and A*A<B*A in both cases A≠B. So is it possible to square an inequality?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You've almost answered the question yourself - stick some numbers in as an example and you're there:

Here's an inequality: 3 > -4

Square both sides : 9 > 16 (which is incorrect!)

However, if you try the same with two positive numbers then the inequality remains. So you can't define a rule that says you can square an inequality (without potentially changing the nature of the inequality
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ArmanZ
mgkii said:
So you can't define a rule that says you can square an inequality
I think it could be, just for two real numbers ##a,b>0.##
##a>b>0,## then ##a^2>b^2.##
##a<b<0,## then ##a^2>b^2.##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ArmanZ
I think my question is not clear. For example 2>4(both are positive).If we square both sides we get 4>16, which would be correct if we did did not consider the following fact: 4>16⇔2*2>4*4 but how could we get 2*2>4*4 from 2>4 if we have to multiply both sides by different numbers( 2 and 4, 2≠4) which is incorrect in principle. Or am I wrong? Because in equation a=b multiplying both sides by a will yield a*a=b*a but a=b so a*a=b*b, which is a^2=b^2. But in inequality it seems to be different. Thanks for your replies guys.
 
I'm not totally sure I understand your question so apologies I've advance if this isn't what you asked:

For an equality it doesn't matter what you do to each side (as long as it's the same) as by definition the starting point for that operation is the same. So multiple by 4, square it, add 6 and double it, whatever you do will be the same as the starting point is the same.

For an inequality there's an infinity of ways each side can differ, so unless you put bounds on your function as one of the earlier responders noted, you can't make general observations about the function you apply to each side (square, multiply by 12, etc)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ArmanZ
ArmanZ said:
I think my question is not clear. For example 2>4(both are positive).If we square both sides we get 4>16, which would be correct if we did did not consider the following fact: 4>16⇔2*2>4*4 but how could we get 2*2>4*4 from 2>4 if we have to multiply both sides by different numbers( 2 and 4, 2≠4) which is incorrect in principle. Or am I wrong? Because in equation a=b multiplying both sides by a will yield a*a=b*a but a=b so a*a=b*b, which is a^2=b^2. But in inequality it seems to be different. Thanks for your replies guys.

Consider two positive numbers ##a## and ##b##. If ##a<b##, then we can multiply both sides with ##a## to get ##a^2 < ab##. We can also multiply both sides with ##b## to get ##ab<b^2##. Putting both together gives ##a^2<ab<b^2##, which gives ##a^2<b^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ArmanZ
ArmanZ said:
I think my question is not clear. For example 2>4(both are positive).If we square both sides we get 4>16, which would be correct
No.
You're starting from a statement that is not true -- 2 is NOT larger than 4.
ArmanZ said:
if we did did not consider the following fact: 4>16⇔2*2>4*4 but how could we get 2*2>4*4 from 2>4 if we have to multiply both sides by different numbers( 2 and 4, 2≠4) which is incorrect in principle. Or am I wrong? Because in equation a=b multiplying both sides by a will yield a*a=b*a but a=b so a*a=b*b, which is a^2=b^2. But in inequality it seems to be different. Thanks for your replies guys.
 
Mark44 said:
No.
You're starting from a statement that is not true -- 2 is NOT larger than 4.
Sorry, I made a careless mistake once again
 
ArmanZ said:
I think my question is not clear. For example 2>4(both are positive).If we square both sides we get 4>16, which would be correct if we did did not consider the following fact: 4>16⇔2*2>4*4 but how could we get 2*2>4*4 from 2>4 if we have to multiply both sides by different numbers( 2 and 4, 2≠4) which is incorrect in principle. Or am I wrong? Because in equation a=b multiplying both sides by a will yield a*a=b*a but a=b so a*a=b*b, which is a^2=b^2. But in inequality it seems to be different. Thanks for your replies guys.
For everyone who found this discussion, in this comment I was implying 2<4, 4<16⇔2*2<4*4, 2*2<4*4. But anyway, I hope the general idea of this discussion is understood correctly by everyone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
8K