MHB Squaring Radical Within A Radical

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radical
AI Thread Summary
The expression (-2sqrt{8 - 2sqrt{7}})^2 is confirmed to be correctly simplified as 4(8 - 2sqrt{7}). There was initial confusion regarding the notation, specifically the placement of the square root. The discussion clarified that the intended expression involved the square root of 7, not a different notation. Participants agreed on the simplification and confirmed the correct interpretation of the expression. The focus remained on ensuring clarity in mathematical notation and simplification.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
(-2sqrt{8 - 2{7}})^2

(-2sqrt{8 - 2{7}})(-2sqrt{8 - 2{7}})

4(8 - 2sqrt{7})

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
greg1313 said:
Yes.

Can it be further simplified?
 
Originally you had "(-2sqrt{8 - 2{7}})^2". Where did the sqrt{7} come from? Did you intend to write "(-2sqrt{8 - 2sqrt{7}})^2"?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Originally you had "(-2sqrt{8 - 2{7}})^2". Where did the sqrt{7} come from? Did you intend to write "(-2sqrt{8 - 2sqrt{7}})^2"?

Yes, I intend to write (-2sqrt{8 - 2sqrt{7}})^2.
 

Thread 'Trigonometry problem of interest'

Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
View full post »
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB How to Simplify a Radicand by Breaking it into Two Parts?
Replies
6
Views
2K
MHB Is it possible to simplify this radical equation without using a calculator?
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Can Higher Degree Nested Radicals Be Simplified?
Replies
41
Views
5K
MHB How do you simplify sqrt{12x^7}?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Is it possible to express cos(40) as a radical?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Order the given radical numbers
Replies
30
Views
3K
MHB Radical Equation Without Constant
Replies
4
Views
1K
B Bounds for the index of a radical
Replies
7
Views
2K
I What is the missing number in this number sequence pattern?
Replies
3
Views
3K
MHB How can I solve radical equations using the given hint?
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top