Squeeze Theorem for an arbitrary metric

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eddo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the applicability of the squeeze theorem in the context of arbitrary metrics on the real numbers (R). It establishes that while the squeeze theorem is straightforward under the standard metric, proving its validity for arbitrary metrics requires demonstrating that if x ≤ y ≤ z, then both d(x, y) ≤ d(x, z) and d(y, z) ≤ d(x, z) hold true. The conversation concludes that this can be shown through a proof by contradiction, confirming that the squeeze theorem is indeed valid for arbitrary metrics on R.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the squeeze theorem in calculus.
  • Familiarity with metric spaces and their properties.
  • Knowledge of proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction.
  • Basic concepts of real analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of arbitrary metrics on R.
  • Explore proof techniques in real analysis, focusing on proof by contradiction.
  • Investigate the implications of the squeeze theorem in different metric spaces.
  • Learn about various types of metrics and their applications in analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of metrics and theorems in calculus.

eddo
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
It is relatively simple to prove the squeeze theorem on the reals, using the usual metric. My question is, can you prove the squeeze theorem on R for an arbitrary metric (on R)? Does this even hold for an arbitrary metric on R? It seems to me that part way through the proof, you would need to show that x<=y<=z implies both that d(x,y)<=d(x,z) and d(y,z)<=d(x,z), where d is the metric. I'm not sure wether or not this is true for an arbitrary metric because I've had little experience with metrics on R other than the usual one. Is there a way to prove this/ is it even true? Thanks for any help/insights.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting question, here's all I have to say: if it were the case that x<y<z and say d(x,z)<d(x,y), then what if you picked y=x and z>x? Then you'd have d(x,z)<0 for x!=z, which means d isn't a metric.
Kevin
 
Thank you, you could use that to prove by contradiction that if x<=y<=z, then d(x,y)<=d(x,z) and d(y,z)<=d(x,z). This was the only missing link in my proof, so assuming the rest was correct, i guess the squeeze theorem is true for an arbitrary metric on R.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K