Stability Analysis for Nyquist Criteria Homework Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Nyquist stability criterion in a homework context, specifically addressing the analysis of encirclements related to open-loop and closed-loop poles in control systems.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the equation for the number of encirclements as the difference between the number of open-loop poles and closed-loop poles on the right-hand side (RHS) of the S plane.
  • Another participant questions the relevance of closed-loop poles in the Nyquist criterion, emphasizing that it is an open-loop stability criterion and that G(s) represents the open-loop transfer function.
  • Some participants clarify that the Nyquist criterion involves encirclements of -1 + j0 and relates to the characteristic equation 1 + G(s), while also noting that the methodology does not involve closed-loop transfer functions.
  • One participant acknowledges confusion regarding the use of closed-loop RHS poles in some cases, expressing a preference for traditional methods that focus solely on open-loop transfer functions.
  • A later reply corrects a previous typo regarding the terminology used in the characteristic equation and admits to misreading the question about encirclement.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the reasoning behind a specific example in the homework, reiterating that the encirclement of (-1,0) is critical for determining stability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement on the role of closed-loop poles in the Nyquist analysis, with some asserting that only open-loop transfer functions should be considered, while others reference cases where closed-loop poles are included. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion, including potential misunderstandings of the Nyquist criterion's application and the specific requirements of the homework question. The participants also express uncertainty about the definitions and methodologies involved in the analysis.

jaus tail
Messages
613
Reaction score
48

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-9_17-33-11.png
[/B]

Homework Equations


Number of encirclements = Number of open loop poles - Number of Close loop poles on Right side of S plane.

The Attempt at a Solution


There is 1 open loop pole on RHS
For Close loop poles I used Routh Herwitz method and got 1 pole on RHS. 1 sign change.
So I get N = 0.
Where am I wrong?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-9_17-32-59.png
    upload_2017-12-9_17-32-59.png
    32.1 KB · Views: 599
  • upload_2017-12-9_17-33-11.png
    upload_2017-12-9_17-33-11.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 1,054
Physics news on Phys.org
jaus tail said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 216387[/B]

Homework Equations


Number of encirclements = Number of open loop poles - Number of Close loop poles on Right side of S plane.
Why are you trying to deal with closed-loop poles? Nyquist is strictly an open-loop stability criterion. G(s) is the open-loop transfer function.
 
rude man said:
Why are you trying to deal with closed-loop poles? Nyquist is strictly an open-loop stability criterion. G(s) is the open-loop transfer function.
Nyquist criteria says encirclement of -1 + j0 is number of open loop poles - series of characteristic equation.
Characteristic equation is 1 + G(s)
 
jaus tail said:
Nyquist criteria says encirclement of -1 + j0 is number of open loop poles - series of characteristic equation.
Characteristic equation is 1 + G(s)
What do you mean by "series of characteristic equation"?
The Nyquist method does not involve closed-loop transfer functions.
Nyquist determines whether the closed-loop transfer function is stable but its methodology does not involve any closed-loop transfer functions.
 
I see from your attachment that in some cases they do consider closed-loop RHS poles, in others they stick to open-loop only.
I have to admit I never heard of doing Nyquist analysis with anything other than open-loop transfer functions. Seems to me undesirable to have to compute 1 + G(s).
So the only way I know to do this is
(1) determine the Re and Im parts of G
(2) draw polar plot of G
(3) follow rules of Nyquist stability determination.
Sorry that's all I can tell you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jaus tail
Sorry for the typo. It was 'zeroes' of characteristic equation and not 'series'. But yeah you're right. I read the question wrong. It says encircle the origin and not encircle -1
 
jaus tail said:
Sorry for the typo. It was 'zeroes' of characteristic equation and not 'series'. But yeah you're right. I read the question wrong. It says encircle the origin and not encircle -1
OK. I have to admit I don't know on what basis the solution to ex. 39 is given.
If G(s) is an open-loop transfer function then the thing that matters for determining stability of G(s)+1 is encirclement of G(s) of (-1,0), not (0,0). In other words, I guess I really don't understand their reasoning.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jaus tail

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
94
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K