Stabilizer subgroups - proof verification

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between stabilizer subgroups \( G_x \) and \( G_y \) when elements \( x \) and \( y \) are in the same orbit under the action of a group \( G \). It is established that if \( y = hx \) for some \( h \in G \), then the stabilizer subgroups are related by the inclusion \( hG_xh^{-1} \subseteq G_y \). The proof involves manipulating the definitions of the stabilizer subgroups and applying group action properties, leading to the conclusion that \( h^{-1}G_yh \subseteq G_x \) can also be shown for completeness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group actions and orbits in group theory.
  • Familiarity with the concept of stabilizer subgroups in group theory.
  • Knowledge of group homomorphisms and conjugation.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and proof techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of group actions in detail, particularly focusing on orbits and stabilizers.
  • Learn about the concept of conjugation in groups and its implications for subgroup relationships.
  • Explore examples of stabilizer subgroups in symmetric groups and their applications.
  • Investigate the role of normal subgroups and their connection to stabilizer subgroups.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students preparing for exams in abstract algebra, particularly those focusing on group theory, as well as mathematicians and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of group actions and stabilizer relationships.

kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
I have a problem that I would like help on. I'm preparing for an exam, and I have provided my work below.

**Problem statement:** Let $G$ act on $X$, and suppose $x,y\in X$ are in the same orbit for this action. How are the stabilizer subgroups $G_x$ and $G_y$ related?

**My attempt:** $G_x = G_y = \{g \in G: gx=x\} = \{g \in G: gy=y\} \forall x,y \in X, \forall g \in G$.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kalish said:
I have a problem that I would like help on. I'm preparing for an exam, and I have provided my work below.

**Problem statement:** Let $G$ act on $X$, and suppose $x,y\in X$ are in the same orbit for this action. How are the stabilizer subgroups $G_x$ and $G_y$ related?

**My attempt:** $G_x = G_y = \{g \in G: gx=x\} = \{g \in G: gy=y\} \forall x,y \in X, \forall g \in G$.
If $x$ and $y$ are in the same orbit then $y=hx$ for some $h\in G.$ Use that information to express the definition of $G_y$ in terms of $x$ rather than $y$. Then see how that compares with the definition of $G_x$.
 
Opalg's post hints at, but does not explicitly state an important fact about group actions:

If $y = hx$, then $x = h^{-1}y$.

To avoid "symbol-overloading" let's use the following notation:

$G_x = \{g \in G: gx = x\}$

$G_y = \{g' \in G: g'y = y\}$.

What can we say about the relationship of $g'$ to $g$? We can start with the most trivial of observations:

$y = y$.

That is:

$y = g'y$ (for $g' \in G_y$).

Since we are given that $y = hx$ for some $h \in G$, we have:

$hx = y = g'y$

Now for $g \in G_x$, we certainly have:

$x = gx$.

Thus $y = hx = h(gx) = (hg)x$.

Hence $(hgh^{-1})y = (hg)(h^{-1}y) = (hg)(x) = h(gx) = hx = y$.

This shows that $hgh^{-1} \in G_y$, that is: $hG_xh^{-1} \subseteq G_y$.

Can you show the other inclusion (you may find it easier to show that $h^{-1}G_yh \subseteq G_x$)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
634
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
963
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K