Stages of life cycle of mammals

  • Thread starter Thread starter dibilo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycle Life
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the stages of the life cycle of mammals, comparing different perspectives on how many stages exist and how they should be defined. Participants explore the implications of definitions and the gradual nature of development in mammals, contrasting it with more distinct life cycles in other species.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that most mammals have a two-stage life cycle: young to adult and back.
  • Another participant suggests a three-stage life cycle: egg to young to adult and back, questioning what "back" refers to.
  • Some participants note that defining "stage" can vary widely, leading to different interpretations based on biological, social, or developmental criteria.
  • It is mentioned that the life cycle of mammals is less distinct than that of animals undergoing metamorphosis, with development being more gradual.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexities of defining life stages in mammals, particularly regarding concepts like neoteny and juvenilism in primates.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of comparing underlying biological truths rather than getting caught up in the terminology of stages.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the number of stages in the life cycle of mammals. There are multiple competing views, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding definitions and interpretations of life stages.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the definitions of life stages can depend on various factors, including biological, social, and developmental contexts, which complicates the discussion. Additionally, the gradual nature of mammalian development contrasts with more distinct life cycles found in other species.

dibilo
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Dear experts, please help me with this debate between my buddy and I.

I'm on the side that most mammals, like cats, dogs, humans and monkeys have 2 stage life cycle. Young --> adult and back.

My buddy says it should be 3 stage egg--> young--> adult and back.

We are both rather weak on this topic. Please help. Thanks!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Hopefully some biologists will chime in with more insight, but on some level this is a moot.

You can define "stage" any way you want, and you will have as many stages as the definition will allow. You can have stages of life defined in biological terms - then between egg and young you can add morula, blastocyst, gastrula and some other and count them all. You can have stages defined in social terms - like childhood and adulthood - and you can count them again. You can also look at the stages of learning, of sexual life - each approach will give you different numbers.

Basically - you have to define what you mean first, and then you can start the discussion. Without a definition that you both agree on you are wasting time (doesn't mean you can't have a good time wasting time, that's a stage of life as well).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Quick post from my phone: borek is correct that in mammals it's pretty hard to draw any distinctive lines between stages of life. Unlike animals which undergo metamorphosis we don't change in radical spurts (I.e form cocoons). If you take the first 20 years of life a human obviously goes through a lot of development but its far more gradual. As for embryological development there are many, many stages defined by key events but that too is a gradual process.
 
dibilo said:
My buddy says it should be 3 stage egg--> young--> adult and back.

Forgive my ignorance, but what is "back"?

I agree with Borek and Ryan, trying to tease out a life cycle for mammals isn't as clear cut as, say, doing the same for a butterfly, especially since there are thorny issues such as "neoteny" and "juvenalism" you have to sort through particularly when it comes to the primates. These issues are still very controversial in contemporary primatology, so you and your buddy are in good company.
 
Human construct vs. metaphysics

Pre-script - Txs to Borek for the seed of this post's idea.

Hey, Discovering the truth about life cycles is interesting - but don't argue about what you call different stages, compare the facts, look at underlying truths in histology, endocrinology, embryology, population biology, etc. Remember that the stages we teach as current theory need to have human constructs in order to communicate. So we have terms for stages and we assign them based on recognizable current facts in morphology, embryology, evolution, etc.

If you're a current student, don't waste your time debating human constructs with fellow students - ask your prof. how she sees it and then regugitate that on the test. Outside of schoolwork and testing you can ask the important questions. Txs, Jack "Philosophy, Who Needs It?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
8K