Standard derivation and probability density

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the standard deviation for the mean distance of an electron from the nucleus, utilizing given values for mean distance and probability density. The original poster presents their calculations and expresses confusion regarding a negative result for .

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate through integration but arrives at a negative value, prompting questions about the validity of their result. Other participants suggest re-evaluating the calculations and highlight the impossibility of a negative .

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in checking calculations and exploring potential errors in the original poster's approach. There is a recognition of the need to identify where the mistake may have occurred, with suggestions to share full calculations for further assistance.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions that part of the calculation was not performed by them, indicating potential gaps in understanding or execution of the integration process.

the riddick25
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the question asks you to calculate the standard derivation for the mean distance of an electron from the nucleus.
you are given the mean distance (<r>), and the probability density

Homework Equations


delta r = sqrt (<r^2> - <r>^2)
<r> = 3.a/2

The Attempt at a Solution


We had to calculate <r^2> by integrating a given value.
after integrating by parts 4 times i ended up with -3a^2
putting this into the standard derivation lead to the square root of minus 21.a^2/4
this obviously gives a complex value.
i was wondering if this can be correct, or if the negative sign has no meaning in the calculation.
i have read from some physics books but i can't find an answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<r^2> can never be negative (otherwise, it would imply that measuring r would tend to yield an imaginary number!). Check your calculations again.
 
i've checked my calculations and i still get a value of -3a^2

i suppose there could be a typo somewhere, but apart from that my answer seems correct for the integral i did.
you end up with;
4/a^3 X (24/(-2/a)^5) = -3a^2

thanks anyway :)
 
What can I say? I mean, thousands of people, students and professors alike, have done this calculation without it being negative, and even using logic itself, <r^2> cannot be negative.

I mean, all I can say is to check your calculations again, there has to be an error somewhere. Either you used the wrong wave function, or you didn't multiply by the complex conjugate, or you didn't integrate correctly, or something...

I'm sure if you put your full calculation here someone will point out to you where you went wrong. That's all I can advise.
 
thanks for your help, i can understand it better now

i have just found the error in the calulation (this bit wasnt actucally done by me), i guess i just glanced over it and forgot to correct it


thanks again :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K