Standing wave with specific initial/boundary conditions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the wave equation with specified initial and boundary conditions, focusing on a standing wave scenario. The participants explore the implications of the boundary conditions and initial conditions on the solution structure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the boundary condition that requires the slope of the wave to be zero at x=0, questioning how this affects the wave's movement. There is uncertainty about how to handle the initial condition involving a delta function and its integration properties.

Discussion Status

Some participants have clarified their understanding of the boundary conditions and their effects on the constants in the solution. There is recognition of the nature of the wave as a standing wave, and some progress has been made in interpreting the initial conditions, though not all aspects are resolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints imposed by the boundary conditions and the specific form of the initial conditions, which include a delta function. There is an ongoing exploration of how these conditions interact and influence the overall solution.

Isow
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Solve the wave equation with the following initial conditions and boundary conditions."

2Y/∂x2 = 1/v2 * ∂2Y/∂t2

Boundary conditions:
∂Y/∂x(x=0, t)=0 and Y(x=L,t)=0

Initial Conditions:
∂Y/∂t(x, t=0) = 0
Y(x,t=0) = δ(x-L/2)

Homework Equations



Using separation of variables:

Y(x,t) = X(x)*T(t)

X(x) = C*cos(kx/L) + D*sin(kx/L)
T(t) = E*cos(wt) + F*sin(wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I'm relatively familiar with this process but I have a couple of hangups relating to these specific initial conditions. First, the requirement that the partial of y with respect to x=0 at all times t (first boundary condition) seems, to me, to make a wave impossible. It gives D=0 AND C=0 OR k=0, but of course all of these are unsatisfactory solutions.

More analytically, it seems that requiring the slope to always be 0 at x=0 is really restricting that piece of the wave from moving. I'm just not sure how to handle it.

Moving past that though (I assumed y(x=0,t)=0 as my first boundary condition giving C=0), I'm also not sure how to handle the initial condition. The initial condition equation, x-L/2, has an integral of 0 when integrated from 0 to L. This makes sense since the expression has equal area above and below y=0, but I still don't know how to handle it in terms of getting an actual solution.

Just thinking out loud as I type this, does the delta in the expression indicate that I should be treating it as an absolute value equation so that all of it is forced to be above y=0?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isow said:

Homework Statement



"Solve the wave equation with the following initial conditions and boundary conditions."

2Y/∂x2 = 1/v2 * ∂2Y/∂t2

Boundary conditions:
∂Y/∂x(x=0, t)=0 and Y(x=L,t)=0

Initial Conditions:
∂Y/∂t(x, t=0) = 0
Y(x,t=0) = δ(x-L/2)

Homework Equations



Using separation of variables:

Y(x,t) = X(x)*T(t)

X(x) = C*cos(kx/L) + D*sin(kx/L)
T(t) = E*cos(wt) + F*sin(wt)

The Attempt at a Solution



So, I'm relatively familiar with this process but I have a couple of hangups relating to these specific initial conditions. First, the requirement that the partial of y with respect to x=0 at all times t (first boundary condition) seems, to me, to make a wave impossible. It gives D=0 AND C=0 OR k=0, but of course all of these are unsatisfactory solutions.

More analytically, it seems that requiring the slope to always be 0 at x=0 is really restricting that piece of the wave from moving. I'm just not sure how to handle it.

Moving past that though (I assumed y(x=0,t)=0 as my first boundary condition giving C=0), I'm also not sure how to handle the initial condition. The initial condition equation, x-L/2, has an integral of 0 when integrated from 0 to L. This makes sense since the expression has equal area above and below y=0, but I still don't know how to handle it in terms of getting an actual solution.

Just thinking out loud as I type this, does the delta in the expression indicate that I should be treating it as an absolute value equation so that all of it is forced to be above y=0?
The Boundary condition, ∂Y/∂x(x=0, t)=0, only makes D = 0 with no restriction on C.
The other Boundary condition gives you k .

It's a standing wave. Right?

What are the conditions at nodes and at anti-nodes?
 
Last edited:
Hey, thanks, that was exactly what I needed! I realized the first boundary condition only set D=0, but I erroneously was thinking that the second boundary condition gave C=0 when, in fact, you're right: it gives k.

I then applied the second initial condition in terms of absolute value, which I think is the correct way to go about it, and everything worked out.

Thanks again!

edit: and yes, it's a standing wave.
 
Isow said:
Hey, thanks, that was exactly what I needed! I realized the first boundary condition only set D=0, but I erroneously was thinking that the second boundary condition gave C=0 when, in fact, you're right: it gives k.

I then applied the second initial condition in terms of absolute value, which I think is the correct way to go about it, and everything worked out.

Thanks again!
You're very welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K