Stark Effect using first order variation theory.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the energy change due to the Stark effect using perturbation theory. The user initially attempted to apply variation theory but corrected their approach to focus on perturbation. The integral for the energy change of the 1s orbital in hydrogen is outlined, but the user encounters an issue with the middle integral yielding zero. The correct volume element in spherical coordinates should be r², not r³, and the perturbation couples the 1s and 2p states, necessitating a reevaluation of the integrals involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Stark effect and its implications
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and Jacobians
  • Basic quantum mechanics concepts, particularly regarding hydrogen atom orbitals
NEXT STEPS
  • Review perturbation theory applications in quantum mechanics
  • Study the Stark effect in detail, focusing on energy level shifts
  • Learn about the coupling of quantum states, particularly 1s and 2p states
  • Explore integration techniques in spherical coordinates for quantum mechanical problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying atomic physics and perturbation theory applications. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the Stark effect and its mathematical treatment.

scorpion990
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
EDIT: Sorry... I have to use perturbation theory. My mistake.

Hey... I have a quick question. I have to calculate the approximate change in energy via variation theory when the 'error' Hamiltonian for the Stark effect is defined as: [tex]|\vec{E}|cos\theta\bullet eR[/tex]

If I'm not mistaken, the change in energy of the 1s orbital of a hydrogen atom will be:

<E>=k[tex]\int r^3e^{-2r/a}dr \int sin\theta cos\theta d\theta \int d\varphi[/tex]

However, the middle integral becomes 0 when the limits of 0 and pi are plugged in. This doesn't seem right. Am I doing anything incorrectly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The perturbation couples 1s with 2p state. It would not perturb the 1s only (In this case your integral is correct). Besides your volume element in r should be r^2 and not r^3.

H_stark=<1s|z|2p>
 
One "r" comes from the definition of the perturbed Hamiltonian. The other two come from the jacobian in spherical coordinates.

I'm not really sure what I have to do now, though. I'm not familiar with your notation. Sorry =(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K