Stat Mech vs. Greek atomistic hypothesis?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hkyriazi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stat mech
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Statistical mechanics has not disproven the ancient Greek atomistic hypothesis that hard, indestructible objects can form the basis of all material bodies. Boltzmann's H-Theorem, as discussed in his "Lectures on Gas Theory," relies on the assumption of molecular chaos, which holds true for convexly-shaped particles. However, the feasibility of models involving non-convex particles, such as Frank Meno's semi-concave needle-like objects, lacks empirical support and is not recognized within established physics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of adhering to current theories rather than exploring unverified personal hypotheses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Boltzmann's H-Theorem
  • Familiarity with molecular chaos and its implications in statistical mechanics
  • Knowledge of particle shapes and their relevance in gas theory
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics and entropy
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Boltzmann's "Lectures on Gas Theory" for foundational concepts
  • Research molecular chaos and its role in statistical mechanics
  • Examine current theories on particle shapes in gas dynamics
  • Investigate the implications of entropy in non-convex particle systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of thermodynamics, and researchers interested in the foundations of statistical mechanics and the validity of atomistic models.

hkyriazi
Messages
174
Reaction score
2
Has statistical mechanics anywhere disproven the ancient Greek idea that hard, indestructible objects (the original "atoms"), that experience no force other than that of impacts, can form the substratum of all material bodies and forces?

I've been reading Boltzmann's "Lectures on Gas Theory" (1896, 1898), and he states that his H-Theorem (which purports to show that entropy must always either increase or stay the same) is dependent upon the assumption of molecular chaos, i.e., that at equilibrium, any gas will have its molecules distributed randomly both in terms of position and velocity.

This seems inevitably to be true for the convexly-shaped particles that constitute atoms and even diatomic molecules (their dumbbell shape is still overall convex). But has it been proven to be true for any shaped particle whatsoever?

Specifically, I'm trying to evaluate the feasibility of a interesting model proposed by Frank Meno, which may be viewed at: crackpot link removed
It's an atomistic hypothesis, but postulates that a gas of hot, hard, semi-concave needle-like objects can maintain dynamically stable structures, despite constant collisions with each other, and no attractive forces between them. Does Stat Mech have anything to say about this, other than that we have no precedent for such a gas or for such behavior?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
The site you linked is a personal theory. I could not detect a shred of meaningful physics. Do not waste your time attempting to unravel it, it is not worth your while. You would be better off making an efffor to understand the current theories.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K