State of the Union: Applause Sign, Soundbites & More

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter polyb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    State Union
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the State of the Union address, focusing on the use of applause signs, the nature of the speech, and the political dynamics surrounding Social Security reform. Participants express their views on the format of the address, reactions to the content, and the implications for bipartisan cooperation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants find the applause sign and the frequent interruptions for applause to be odd and reminiscent of a pep rally.
  • Several comments highlight the rhetorical nature of the speech, with participants noting that it often lacks substantive content beyond general reassurances.
  • Historical context is provided regarding the tradition of applause during State of the Union addresses, with references to past speeches and party dynamics.
  • There are observations about the political motivations behind the Democrats' responses to the speech, suggesting that they may be more focused on political power than on genuine reform.
  • Some participants express frustration with the perceived obstructionism of the Democrats regarding Social Security reform, arguing that both parties are more concerned with political gain than with the welfare of the American people.
  • A participant mentions the lack of voter pressure on Democrats to act on Social Security reform, suggesting that this may contribute to their reluctance to engage in meaningful discussions.
  • There are mixed feelings about the effectiveness of the speech, with some participants noting that it did not provoke strong negative reactions compared to previous addresses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on the effectiveness of the speech or the motivations of the political parties involved. Disagreement exists regarding the implications of the applause and the sincerity of the political responses.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific historical instances and political dynamics without resolving the complexities of the current political landscape or the implications of the speech's content.

  • #31
franznietzsche said:
Drag the country into a rotting cesspool of socialist idiocy is not what i would prefer,

I despise bush. But i despised kerry more.

when i speak of enema, i mean getting rid of it all. a metaphorical atomic bomb wiping out washingotn.
Why, you must hate America...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Curious3141 said:
Very interesting. Bush seems to be moving towards a model that Singapore has had for a long time : the Central Provident Fund or CPF for short. Of course, our model is more all encompassing and entrenched, but your leader seems to be sympathetic to this sort of thinking in principle.

In the CPF model, citizens are forced to put aside a hefty portion (a fixed percentage, dependent on salary bracket, I'm paying nearly 20 %) of their pre-tax salaries into government administered accounts. This money cannot be withdrawn even in part before the age of 55, and under recently introduced laws, cannot be withdrawn completely *ever* unless citizenship is renounced.

CPF money is supposed to support the elderly when they become economically non-viable and their dependents don't support them. Our government doesn't want to be stuck with the encumberance of looking after a massive load of aging people (who've slogged for the nation in their best years) with a welfare scheme, so they have this. There are some allowances in the use of CPF, for instance, investing in property is allowed using CPF monies, but replenishment of CPF is mandatory, with interest. The CPF can be used to invest in blue chip shares (non-speculative) but all dividends and capital gains have to come back into the CPF.

How does your intended system compare ?

Is it true you can get fined $10,000 for spitting in singapore?
 
  • #33
Smurf said:
Is it true you can get fined $10,000 for spitting in singapore?

Fines apply, but not that much, usually about Singapore$1000 (about USD 625).
 
  • #34
That's enough to keep a poor family in food for a year, spit or not.
 
  • #35
Hope that money goes towards social services heh.
 
  • #36
Loren Booda said:
That's enough to keep a poor family in food for a year, spit or not.

And your point is ??

That money goes into government funds, some of which of course goes to help those in need.

At any rate, I think it costs a lot more than a 1000 Singapore dollars to keep a family at the subsitence level in Singapore. The cost of living is not that low here. But poverty levels are very low and most enjoy a decent standard of living.
 
  • #37
The point being that in one country the value of spit feeds a poor family in another for a year. Singapore, like my US, enjoys a somewhat delusional economic view of the world.
 
  • #38
And a few briefly-mentioned, minor notes:

Respect For Women – Would that mean allowing women to have determination over their own bodies and life?

Gang Violence – Would that mean taking control of our borders and enforcing immigration law?

Ethanol – Would that mean concern for the environment and energy alternatives to OIL? Right, and this “unlimited” source of alternative fuel from corn production would not be affected by climate/weather changes due to global warming…from use of fossil fuel (i.e. oil)?

Aside from tax cuts for the wealthy, trade deficits due to pacts with China, outsourcing American jobs, spending like drunken sailors helping countries other than our own, diverting funds away from Social Security, etc. could we think of some more ways to destroy America?

How do I get this purple ink off my middle finger?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 110 ·
4
Replies
110
Views
13K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 169 ·
6
Replies
169
Views
20K