MHB State the range of the reciprocal function?

eleventhxhour
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
State the range of the reciprocal function of f(x) = - (x+3)^2 - 1.

I'm not sure if I did this right. I wrote that y is above/equal to -1 and below/equal to 0. Is this correct?

Also, how would you graph the reciprocal function of f(x) if there is no VA and only a HA?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We could write the reciprocal function $g$ as:

$$g(x)=\frac{1}{f(x)}=-\frac{1}{(x+3)^2+1}$$

Now, to find the rage of $g$, I would write:

$$y=-\frac{1}{(x+3)^2+1}=-\frac{1}{x^2+6x+10}$$

Now, express this equation in standard form as a quadratic in $x$, and then require the discriminant to be non-negative...this will result in an inequality which gives the range of the reciprocal function. You will find that you are correct.

To graph, consider that $g$ is the graph of $$y=-\frac{1}{x^2+1}$$, shifted 3 units to the left. This function is even, meaning it is symmetric about the $y$-axis, so $g$ will be symmetric across $x=-3$. It has as its maximum value that place where the denominator is the largest (because it is a negative reciprocal), which is the end-behavior, that is where x goes to $\pm\infty$. So, we know the $x$-axis is the horizontal asymptote. It has as its minimum value the place where the denominator is the smallest, that is, where the squared term is zero.

You now have enough information to construct a reasonably accurate graph. It should look like:

View attachment 3416
 

Attachments

  • reciprocal.png
    reciprocal.png
    11.3 KB · Views: 110
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top