State Transition Matrix, Determining States

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



An LTI system is given in state-space form,

[itex]\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \dot{x_{1}} \\<br /> \dot{x_{2}}<br /> \end{array} \right)<br /> =<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> -1 & 0.5 \\<br /> 1 & 0<br /> \end{array} \right)<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> x_{1} \\<br /> x_{2}<br /> \end{array} \right)<br /> +<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 0.5 \\<br /> 0<br /> \end{array} \right)<br /> u[/itex]

A unit-step signal is applied to the input of the system. If,

[itex]x_{1}(0) = 1, \quad x_{2}(0) = 0[/itex]

determine the state of the system after t = 0.1 sec.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



[itex]\underline{\dot{x}} = \underline{A} \underline{x} + \underline{B}u[/itex]

[itex]\mathcal{L} \Rightarrow s \underline{X(s)} - \underline{x(0)} = \underline{A}\underline{X(s)} + \underline{B} U(s)[/itex]

[itex]\Rightarrow \underline{X(s)} = (s\underline{I} - \underline{A})^{-1} \underline{x(0)} + (s\underline{I} - \underline{A})^{-1}\underline{B}U(s)[/itex]

Working through the simplification I obtain,

[itex]\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> X_{1}(s) \\<br /> X_{2}(s)<br /> \end{array} \right)<br /> =<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{s}{s^{2}+s-0.5}\\<br /> \frac{1}{s^{2}+s-0.5}<br /> \end{array} \right)<br /> +<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \frac{0.5}{s^{2}+s-0.5}\\<br /> \frac{0.5}{s(s^{2}+s-0.5)}<br /> \end{array} \right)[/itex]
Thus,
[itex] X_{1}(s) = \frac{s}{s^{2}+s-0.5} + \frac{0.5}{s^{2}+s-0.5}[/itex]
[itex] X_{2}(s) = \frac{1}{s^{2}+s-0.5} + \frac{0.5}{s(s^{2}+s-0.5)}[/itex]

How can I put this in a form that I can easily pull out of the s-domain back into time domain using inverse Laplace transform? If weren't for the -0.5 in the denominator I think I could work something out by reworking it into one of the following two forms,
[itex] \frac{\omega}{(s+a)^{2} + \omega^{2}} \quad \text{ or } \quad \frac{s+a}{(s+a)^{2} + \omega^{2}} [/itex]

Any ideas? Did I make a mistake in my simplification perhaps?
 
on Phys.org
1.) what are the initial conditions for the system? i am assuming x(0) equals zero. If x(0) equals zero you need to remove those second sections from your equations for X1 and X2.

2.)
below is one of the forms you were talking about
e^(-at)*sin(wt) = invlap{ω /( (s+a)^2+ω^2)}

why don't you try this one?
e^(-at)*sinh(wt) = invlap{ω /( (s+a)^2-ω^2)}
 
donpacino said:
1.) what are the initial conditions for the system?

They are provided in the original post.
 
jegues said:
[itex] X_{1}(s) = \frac{s}{s^{2}+s-0.5} + \frac{0.5}{s^{2}+s-0.5}[/itex]
[itex] X_{2}(s) = \frac{1}{s^{2}+s-0.5} + \frac{0.5}{s(s^{2}+s-0.5)}[/itex]

My apologies. For some reason I though that was the input vector.

due to the fact that X2(0)=0, your expression for X2(s) is not correct. Eliminate the second part of the statement