MHB State with reasons that angle ACB is bisected by line OC

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Line State
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
Here is the Problem

View attachment 6180

Here is the construction, Hoping that I have done it correct "State with reasons that $\angle$ ACB is bisected by line OC"

View attachment 6181

Many THanks (Party)
 

Attachments

  • New Document 60.jpg
    New Document 60.jpg
    32.9 KB · Views: 98
  • 002.jpg
    002.jpg
    36.6 KB · Views: 118
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
AB is given as 6 cm and the circle should be tangent to AB.
 
greg1313 said:
AB is given as 6 cm and the circle should be tangent to AB.

Yes I updated the diagram correcting that error :) As AB = AC as they are tangents drawn to the circle from external point A. $\therefore \angle{ABC}=\angle{ACB}$

But still how can it be proved that
State with reasons that $\angle {ACB}$ is bisected by line OC"
 
Let $X$ be any point outside of a circle $C$. Let the points $Y$, $Z$ be the points of tangency at the circle $C$ and the lines $XY$ and $XZ$. What can be said about triangles $XYC$ and $XZC$ ?
 
mathlearn said:
Here is the Problem
Here is the construction, Hoping that I have done it correct "State with reasons that $\angle$ ACB is bisected by line OC"
Many THanks (Party)

greg1313 said:
Let $X$ be any point outside of a circle $C$. Let the points $Y$, $Z$ be the points of tangency at the circle $C$ and the lines $XY$ and $XZ$. What can be said about triangles $XYC$ and $XZC$ ?

Thanks but I doubt whether the Line $OC$ bisects angle $ACB$ which is really inside the triangle ? (Thinking) Have I done the construction wrong? Is the type of the circle correct?
 
See post #2.

The relation that is to be found is true in general, which is what I was trying to get at in post #4. Make the necessary corrections and apply the hints I gave to state your answer (with reasons).
 
greg1313 said:
See post #2.

The relation that is to be found is true in general, which is what I was trying to get at in post #4. Make the necessary corrections and apply the hints I gave to state your answer (with reasons).
View attachment 6185

Many THanks :)
 

Attachments

  • 002.jpg
    002.jpg
    41.2 KB · Views: 92

Attachments

  • State.png
    State.png
    14.1 KB · Views: 92
:D Thank you very much , I was struggling a long here for around a day or two

The sides was produced in the other direction

And Greg I think the reason for the bisection is the congruence of those two triangles due to the radius of the circle at the tangent and the common line CD and the 90 degree angle formed at the tangent line and the radius

Many THanks (Smile)
 
  • #10
That's correct. Good work! :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Back
Top