Static Equilibrium Reaction Question about Fixed Point

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a static equilibrium problem involving forces and moments acting on a beam. The user initially calculated the vertical reaction force at point A (Ay) as 1.722 kN but expressed uncertainty about the method and correctness of the answer. Responses clarified that the beam's weight is negligible and emphasized the importance of accounting for both the force and moment at point A to achieve equilibrium. Additionally, the concept of a 'pure' moment produced by a couple was highlighted, suggesting the user needs to set up separate equations for the sum of vertical forces and moments about point A. The conversation encourages revisiting the calculations to ensure accurate results for the beam's equilibrium.
Grandpa04
Messages
2
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Determine the reaction at fixed point A
Relevant Equations
ΣFx = 0
ΣFy = 0
ΣM = 0
Screenshot 2024-02-26 at 12.40.43 PM.png

For this problem I set ΣFy = -3kN - 0.75kN - 3kN + Ay + By (with By representing the right side vertical force, and Ay representing the left side force). For ΣM, I used the rectangular distributed load of 0.5 kN at 3m from point A as the pivot:
ΣM = -3m*Ay - (0.5kN*4m) - 3kN*6m - 5kN*m + By*6m.
I solved the system of the two equations and found Ay to be 1.722 kN. I am unsure if I used the correct/best method for the problem and if the answer is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see no indication of an unknown force at B. Instead, I suggest there is a torque at A.
 
Could you explain the 0.75kN value?
If you represent the calculated value for Ay in the diagram, would the beam remain in equilibrium of forces and moments?
 
Grandpa04 said:
I am unsure if I used the correct/best method for the problem and if the answer is correct.
Hi @Grandpa04. Your answer isn't correct. In addition to the other replies, this might help.

If you have posted the complete question, then we assume that the beam’s weight is negligible - as there is no mention of the weight.

The given externally applied forces are the distributed load and the 3kN force.

The given externally applied moment (torque) is the one shown as 5 kN.m (CW.). Note that this is 'pure' moment - e.g. produced by a couple. (You may have to read-up on this if you are not familiar with it. E.g. look-up 'moment of a couple'.)

For the beam to be in equilibrium, the reaction at A must balance the given externally applied forces and moment.

So the reaction at A consists of two parts: a force (##F_A##) and a moment (##M_A##). You are required to find both of these.

There are no forces in the x-direction (as you correctly imply in your working).

You need to set up 1 equation for the sum of the y-forces; solving this gives you ##F_A##.

You need to set up 1 equation for the sum of the moments about A; solving this gives you ##M_A##.

Have another go and post your working and answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top