1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Static equilibrium of a beam, 2 force and 3 force member?

  1. Jul 12, 2015 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    20150712_185820_zpssosb0c9d.jpg

    2. Relevant equations
    ΣF=0
    ΣM=0

    3. The attempt at a solution
    20150712_192933_zps0gejlr35.jpg
    I think i correctly identified two 2 force members at A and B. But would the system be a 3 force member? If it is i dont quite know how to solve for the missing angles.
    Is the problem asking for the sum of the forces at A and B including moments at each point? Thanks.
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2015
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 12, 2015 #2
    You usually only need to pick one axis and properly sum the torques to be zero, along with the equilibrium force equations.

    You can pick any axis, but making a good choice always makes the math easier.
     
  4. Jul 12, 2015 #3
    Would the sum of torques about the y-axis be the only choice?
     
  5. Jul 12, 2015 #4
    Summing the torques about any axis into or out of the page would work.

    But some choices are easier than others.
     
  6. Jul 12, 2015 #5
    I dont understand how to sum the torques about the entire axis, wouldnt you need to split it up at the points given?

    edit: would the sum of moments about the axis be the equal to sum of the equations i have? ΣMA+MB+MC

    edit; this is not a homework problem, i would like to figure this out before my exam tomorrow though. I think this one has an easy way to solve it because of the 2 force and 3 force members but i cant remember how to apply that technique.

    I have 5 equations and im trying to find the angle α, do my equilibrium equations look right?
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2015
  7. Jul 12, 2015 #6
    I dont think the problem has enough information to solve for numerical values.
     
  8. Jul 12, 2015 #7

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    For a rigid body, in a 2D problem, there are only three equations available. Yes, you can write down as many as you like by taking moments about different points, and by resolving linear forces in different directions, but it will turn out that the equations are not independent. There will be three from which all others can be deduced. If you resolve in two different directions and take moments about some point, that will give you all the equations you can usefully get. As Dr Courtney posts, some selections for the reference axis may be more convenient than others.
    The 5 equations you posted involve the three unknowns as follows:
    1. alpha, FB
    2. alpha,FA, FB
    3. alpha, FB
    4. alpha, FA
    5. FA, FB
    Pick n equations involving n of the unknowns, including alpha.
     
  9. Jul 12, 2015 #8

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    You can only write one moment equation for this beam, using either point A, B, or C as the reference. (Hint: there are two choices of moment reference which will simplify the solution of the equations of statics, so that you can determine angle α.)

    You cannot write three moment equations, as you have done, and expect to solve this problem.
    This is a simple statics problem. All you need to solve it are the equations of statics, ΣF = 0 and ΣM = 0.

    2-force or 3-force members are completely irrelevant to obtaining the solution.

    Remember, for ΣF = 0, ΣFx = 0 and ΣFy = 0.

    The support links at A and B are pinned connections. Only forces can be developed there, no moments. If you draw the FBD of the beam CAB, like you started to do in your calculations, there is enough information here to solve for α.

    Pick one point about which to take moments, and the other two moment equations can be discarded.
     
  10. Jul 12, 2015 #9
    equations 1. and 5. have all the unknowns. so then I could sum them and they will equal 0
    edit; actually i will need 3 equations with 3 unknowns, so 1,2, and 5
     
  11. Jul 12, 2015 #10

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    I didn't make clear that I was concentrating on the first question - finding alpha. For that, the obvious choice is equations 1 and 3. Neither involves FA, so it's very quick.
    More generally, picking three at random might not work. You might happen to pick one that can be derived from the other two. Safest is to use the two linear equations and any one moment equation.
     
  12. Jul 12, 2015 #11
    ok, using 1 and 3 ive got it down to cosα-sinα=(FBsin30 - 2FBcos30)/4
    edit: i dont know of any trig identies to solve this
     
  13. Jul 12, 2015 #12

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    That doesn't help because you now have only one equation but still two unknowns.
    The basic procedure in solving simultaneous equations is to use one equation to express one unknown in terms of others, then use that to substitute for that unknown in all of the other equations.
     
  14. Jul 12, 2015 #13
    ok so let me attempt to solve 1 for alpha and then substitute alpha into eq 3.
    edit: actually just cosα from the eq 1. then sub that into eq 3
    edit2: on closer inspection im going to solve for FB then sub that into eq 3
     
  15. Jul 12, 2015 #14
    does this answer look correct; α=arctan(2 cos30/sin30)
     
  16. Jul 12, 2015 #15

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    Yes.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Static equilibrium of a beam, 2 force and 3 force member?
  1. 3 force members (Replies: 1)

Loading...