MHB Stationary distribution for a doubly stochastic matrix.

Jason4
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I can find the stationary distribution vector $\boldsymbol\pi$ for a stochastic matrix $P$ using:

$\boldsymbol\pi P=\boldsymbol\pi$, where $\pi_1+\pi_2+\ldots+\pi_k=1$

However, I can't find a textbook that explains how to do this for a doubly stochastic (bistochastic) matrix. Could somebody show me how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jason said:
I can find the stationary distribution vector $\boldsymbol\pi$ for a stochastic matrix $P$ using:

$\boldsymbol\pi P=\boldsymbol\pi$, where $\pi_1+\pi_2+\ldots+\pi_k=1$

However, I can't find a textbook that explains how to do this for a doubly stochastic (bistochastic) matrix. Could somebody show me how?

Doubly stochastic matrices are a subset of right stochastic matrices so the same method should work, unless you have something else in mind for the stationary distribution.

CB
 
Well my notes say:

The limiting distribution for a doubly stochastic is the uniform distribution over the state space, i.e.

$\boldsymbol\pi=\left(1/n,...,1/n\right)$ for an $n\times n$ matrix.

So I assume that if both the columns and the rows sum to 1, you don't have to solve any equations.

Why is this?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top