Steady state heat equation in a rectangle with a punkt heat source

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the steady state heat equation in a rectangular domain with a point heat source. The user attempted various methods including separation of variables and Green's function but encountered difficulties in applying boundary conditions and determining constants. The boundary conditions specified include Dirichlet conditions for the bottom surface and Neumann conditions for the other sides. The user seeks guidance on how to proceed with finding the constants related to the eigenfunctions of the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the steady state heat equation
  • Familiarity with separation of variables technique
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions (Dirichlet and Neumann)
  • Basic concepts of eigenfunctions and eigenvalues
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for applying boundary conditions in partial differential equations
  • Study Green's function techniques for solving heat equations
  • Learn about eigenvalue problems in the context of heat equations
  • Explore numerical methods for approximating solutions to PDEs with point sources
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working on heat transfer problems, particularly those dealing with partial differential equations and boundary value problems.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,932
Reaction score
283
Homework Statement
Solve the steady state heat equation in a rectangle whose bottom surface is kept at a fixed temperature, left and right sides are insulated and top side too, except for a point in a corner where heat is generated constantly through time.
Relevant Equations
##\kappa \nabla ^2 T + g =0##
I have checked several textbooks about the heat equation in a rectangle and I have found none that deals with my exact problem. I have though to use separation of variables first (to no avail), then Green's function (to no avail), then simplifying the problem for example by defining a new function in terms of ##T(x,y)## such that it would satisfy a homogeneous problem instead, but to no avail. (is a problem even called homogeneous when ##dT/dx|_{x_0} = 0## rather than ##T(x=x_0)=0##? I guess not.)

Out of memory, when I went with separation of variables to tackle ##\kappa \left( \frac{\partial ^2 T}{\partial x^2}+ \frac{\partial ^2 T}{\partial y^2}\right) = 0##, I obtained solutions of the form ##X(x)Y(y)## with ##X(x)=A\cosh(\alpha x)+B\sinh(\alpha x)## and ##Y(y)=C\cos(\alpha y)+D\sin(\alpha y)## where ##\alpha## is the separation constant. The boundary conditions are of the type Dirichlet for the bottom surface: ##T(x,y=0)=T_0##. And Neumann elsewhere: ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}|_{x=0, y=0}## for ##y\in [0,b)##, ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}|_{x=a, y=0}## for ##y\in [0,b]## and ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial y}|_{x, y=b}## for ##x\in (0,a]##. The power generated translates as the Neumann boundary condition ##\nabla T \cdot \hat n## and so ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial x}|_{x=0, y=b}+ \frac{\partial T}{\partial y}|_{x=0, y=b}=p## where ##p## is the power density of the heat source.

I have been stuck there, I could not get to apply and know the constants ##A##, ##B##, ##C## and ##D##, nor ##\alpha##. All of these constants are in fact depending on ##n##, natural numbers, because the separable solutions are eigenfunctions, etc.

Any pointer would be appreciated. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I’m thinking of an array of sources and sinks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K