Steam table data vs experimental : Why the difference?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancies between experimental temperature and pressure data obtained from a boiler apparatus and the established values in steam tables. The experimental results show a consistent 4 degrees Celsius lower than the steam table data. Key factors contributing to this variance include potential calibration errors in temperature sensors, such as thermocouples and Pt100s, and the conditions under which the steam tables were created, which are derived from extensive statistical analysis of historical data. Participants suggest improving experimental accuracy by calibrating sensors against known standards, such as boiling water at 100°C.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with boiler apparatus and steam generation
  • Knowledge of sensor calibration techniques
  • Experience with data analysis and statistical methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calibration methods for thermocouples and Pt100 sensors
  • Investigate the historical conditions and equipment used to create steam tables
  • Learn about statistical analysis techniques applied in thermodynamic data compilation
  • Explore methods for reducing measurement errors in experimental setups
USEFUL FOR

Thermodynamics students, engineers designing boilers and heat exchangers, and researchers interested in experimental validation of thermodynamic data.

Doctor_Doom
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey guys! Was wondering if someone could help me out. I'm doing a thermodynamics topic and have an issue explaining the following :

I conducted and experimental procedure involving a boiler apparatus. (Similar to this one >> http://www.armfield.co.uk/th3_datasheet.html" ) Now the idea was to find the pressure and temperature for a set of data points. These data points are then to be compared to the "Steam Table" data points.

http://www.uploadpad.com/files/dfsdfsdf4.jpg

The red line is the experimental results and the blue is the data gained from the steam tables. There is roughly a 4 degree Celsius difference at each pressure point.

I have to explain why there is a variance in my results? Now human error or apparatus error is just not good enough for the explanation. Is there a concrete thermodynamical explanation?

Help would be greatly appreciated!

Ohh on the side note: How can I improve the experimental apparatus or conditions to get closer to the steam table results??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I design boilers and heat exchangers for a living. The steam tables are solid as a rock. I think you should think hard on how your system of measurement differs from the system used to create the steam tables.
 
On the plus side, the trend is bob on.
 
How did you calibrate the pressure & temperature indications?
 
The calibration was done by a resistance correction chart.(The temperature measurements were done via an electronic resistor).

So my question just to repeat it again was : How did "they" assemble the steam tables? Under what conditions? And why do my results differ by 4 degrees Celsius ?? There must be a logical explanation why my results are in the same trend but at slightly lower temperature values!
 
Doctor_Doom said:
The calibration was done by a resistance correction chart.(The temperature measurements were done via an electronic resistor).
As mentioned, the steam tables are solid. Calibrating sensors should be done by testing at a known temperature to ensure the measurement corresponds. In this case, putting the sensor in boiling water at a known ambient pressure should provide an accurate basis for the measurement. In other words, put the sensor in water that's known to be boiling at 100 C and make sure the reading is correct.

EDIT: Isn't there an 'offset' adjustment on the device you were using to read out the measurement?
 
Last edited:
Thermocouples can have an error of 1.5°C or more. Pt100's are more accurate. What is the quality of the steam you are using? Pressure sensors also have accuracy issues (1-3% FS for festo parts for example). Try putting some error bars on your measured points.
 
Q_Goest said:
As mentioned, the steam tables are solid. Calibrating sensors should be done by testing at a known temperature to ensure the measurement corresponds. In this case, putting the sensor in boiling water at a known ambient pressure should provide an accurate basis for the measurement. In other words, put the sensor in water that's known to be boiling at 100 C and make sure the reading is correct.

EDIT: Isn't there an 'offset' adjustment on the device you were using to read out the measurement?

There is only calibration tables available, which in a way acts as an 'offset'(but I applied them). The funny thing is I can't find any historical conditions / equipment that was used to produce the steam table data points. Can anyone post a link of the conditions and equipment used at the time of the steam table creation.
 
Doctor_Doom said:
...I can't find any historical conditions / equipment that was used to produce the steam table data points. Can anyone post a link of the conditions and equipment used at the time of the steam table creation.
Tables such as these are generally created from a large amount of data taken from numerous papers. I have to assume the editor of the table takes the data and does some statistical analysis on it in order to get the degree of accuracy found in the tables. If you're interested in determining how the experiments were done, you might look through some of the references used to create the steam table.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K