Stewart platform and closed loops

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether knowing the lengths of the six links in a Stewart platform is sufficient to define the position and orientation of the top plate, assuming a fixed base. One participant argues that creating six closed loop equations and using numerical methods like Newton-Raphson is necessary for accurate calculations, while a colleague believes that simple geometry based on the lengths alone suffices. The complexity of the kinematic problem is highlighted, emphasizing that just having the lengths does not account for the uncertainties in orientation. The conversation suggests that a deeper understanding of kinematics is required to resolve the issue. Ultimately, the debate revolves around the adequacy of geometric solutions versus the need for non-linear analysis in solving the Stewart platform's kinematics.
Trying2Learn
Messages
375
Reaction score
57
TL;DR Summary
How to compute the orientation
Hello!

(I am not asking for someone to do this for me. I am only asking a qualitative question.)

Suppose one knows the lengths of all six links that are involved in the Stewart platform.

Is that enough to define the position and orientation of the top (assuming the base is fixed)

I would take the route of creating six closed loop equations for each of the six struts and using Newton-Raphson (or similar) to
compute pitch, yaw, roll, heave, sway, surge of the top.

However, a colleague is arguing with me that just knowing the lengths of the six arms should be enough.

Picture attached
 

Attachments

  • An-example-of-six-DOF-Stewart-platform-DOF-degree-of-freedom.png
    An-example-of-six-DOF-Stewart-platform-DOF-degree-of-freedom.png
    6 KB · Views: 124
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have you tried searching for how to solve the Steward platform kinematics?
 
Filip Larsen said:
Have you tried searching for how to solve the Steward platform kinematics?
No, but that is because I know how I would do it: write six closed loop equations.

I am more interested in why my colleague insists that just knowing the lengths, is sufficient.
(Actually I did do a search, but most is about the dynamics of it, and I am not focused on that.)

I really want to understand if just knowing the lengths (and some fundamental geometry) is sufficient.
For I would solve the non linear closed loop equations using Newton Raphson (or something like that).

In other words: assume a pitch yaw roll heave sway surge of the top plate. Then, travel from the bottom center, up to the midpoint ( unknowns for position), and then out and back down (involving the pitch, yaw and roll). Get the six non-linear equations and solve.

My colleauge insists that is too complicated and that simple geometry and the six lengths are enough. I don't think so.
 
Filip Larsen said:
Have you tried searching for how to solve the Steward platform kinematics?
In other words...

If i take off the top plate and remove the six struts, I have six struts of known length.

Now I have to reassemble the platform, but all I have are six legs of specific length -- and I do not think I can reassemble it: he insists it is possible. I think there is too much uncertainty about the orientation of the legs.

I think that that it is NOT geometrically simple (like my colleagues says) and does require a non-linear analysis.
 
To me it still sounds like you are asking if the (forward) kinematic problem can be solved in closed form, a question which I believed can be answered by searching for how to solve that problem. That the problem is described as a problem in kinematic does not mean it is only relevant for when the platform is moving.

Alternatively you can perhaps enter into a dialog with your colleagues to settle the details. In any case it is hard for us to guess what you or your colleagues mean during some discussion you had.
 
Thread 'What type of toilet do I have?'
I was enrolled in an online plumbing course at Stratford University. My plumbing textbook lists four types of residential toilets: 1# upflush toilets 2# pressure assisted toilets 3# gravity-fed, rim jet toilets and 4# gravity-fed, siphon-jet toilets. I know my toilet is not an upflush toilet because my toilet is not below the sewage line, and my toilet does not have a grinder and a pump next to it to propel waste upwards. I am about 99% sure that my toilet is not a pressure assisted...
After over 25 years of engineering, designing and analyzing bolted joints, I just learned this little fact. According to ASME B1.2, Gages and Gaging for Unified Inch Screw Threads: "The no-go gage should not pass over more than three complete turns when inserted into the internal thread of the product. " 3 turns seems like way to much. I have some really critical nuts that are of standard geometry (5/8"-11 UNC 3B) and have about 4.5 threads when you account for the chamfers on either...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
Back
Top