Stiffness matrix of bending plate

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the stiffness matrix for bending plates in elasticity theory, specifically focusing on the integration methods used to evaluate the stiffness matrix components and the implications of shear locking in finite element analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the stiffness matrix equation for bending plates and questions the applicability of Gauss integration given the polynomial order of the terms involved.
  • Another participant clarifies that Gaussian integration can be exact for polynomials of order 2n-1 and discusses the reasons for choosing approximate integration methods, such as avoiding shear locking.
  • A subsequent post seeks confirmation on whether Gauss integration can indeed be performed in this context.
  • Another participant asserts that while Gauss integration can always be performed, its effectiveness may vary, and suggests that it is generally a good method for numerical integration in finite element modeling.
  • Participants mention the existence of other numerical integration methods without detailing them.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Gauss integration can be performed, but there is no consensus on whether it is the best method for evaluating the integrals in this specific case. The discussion reflects differing views on the appropriateness of Gauss integration versus other methods.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of the stiffness matrix evaluation and the potential limitations of using Gauss integration, particularly in relation to shear locking phenomena. There are unresolved questions regarding the polynomial order of the terms and the implications for integration accuracy.

Ronankeating
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
hi,

I'm studying the book for elasticity theory and I stuck at one of the equation in that book, the stiffness matrix for elements(thin or thick plate) in bending is given in that form

ke= t∫∫BT*Db*B*det(J)dζdη+∫∫BT*Ds*B*det(J)dζdη
  • B is the strain matrix(5x12) where the inner products include the shape function and derivation of shape function regarding the ζ and η.
  • Db is the bending coefficient matrix (5x5) (scalar)
  • Ds is the shear coefficient matrix (5x5) (scalar)
  • det(J) is the determinant of Jacobian matrix (2x2)
and book suggests that the equation can be solved by carrying out the Gauss integration, with 2 Gauss points for 1st term and 1 Gauss point for 2nd term, in order to avoid the shear locking phenomenon.

The question is:
Since I know that shape function(Ni = 1/4(1 + ξ*ξi )(1 + η*ηi)) is bilinear of ζ and η. B matrix is 1st order bilinear, so BT*Db*B yieleds 2nd order. Form of det(J) is also ζ and η dependent. Multiplication of all of this terms will result in at least 3 order form of equation , is that really can be solved with Gauss integration?

Regards,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Gaussian integration with n points (in one dimension) is exact for polynomials of order 2n-1.

In any case, there are often reasons NOT to want to do "exact" integration. (For example you mentioned one reason, to avoid shear locking). Gaussian integration is similar to fitting an approximate polynomial to the "exact" function by least squares, and integrating the approximate polynomial.
 
Thanks in advance,

So as a result Gauss integration can be performed?
 
Well, obviously it CAN always be performed. The question is whether it is a good or bad way to evaluate the integrals. Usually, it's a good way, or at least "good enough", considering the output from the FE model is only an approximation to the "exact" solution of a continuum mechanics problem, and the continuum mechanics problem is only an approximation to the real-world situation.

There are other numerical integration methods which you might find out about later in your course, so don't get the idea that it's the ONLY way to do numerical integration for finite elements.
 
Thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
18K