Stoke's and Gauss's Theorum in proving div(curlA)=0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the identity div(curl A) = 0 using Gauss's and Stokes's Theorem. The participant expresses difficulty in initiating the proof but acknowledges that both the Divergence Theorem and Stokes's Theorem are applicable. The proof requires understanding the definitions of the nabla operator, cross product, and dot product, particularly under the condition that A has continuous second-order derivatives.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stokes's Theorem
  • Familiarity with the Divergence Theorem
  • Knowledge of the nabla operator
  • Proficiency in vector calculus, specifically cross product and dot product
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the applications of Stokes's Theorem in vector calculus
  • Explore the Divergence Theorem and its implications in three-dimensional space
  • Review the properties and applications of the nabla operator
  • Practice problems involving div(curl A) and continuous second-order derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on vector calculus and differential equations, will benefit from this discussion.

SquidgyGuff
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem puts forth and identity for me to prove:
gif.gif
or
gif.gif
. It says that I can use "straight-forward" calculation to solve this using the definition of nabla or I can use Gauss's and Stoke's Theorum on an example in which I have a solid 3D shape nearly cut in two by a curve C.

Homework Equations


gif.gif
Divergence Theorum
gif.gif
Stoke's Theorum

The Attempt at a Solution


I just can't seem to figure out how to start this. The two equations above are clearly suited to proving this identity, but I just can't see how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is easier to use the definition of Nabla, and the definitions of cross product and dot product.
 
ehild said:
I think it is easier to use the definition of Nabla, and the definitions of cross product and dot product.
Oh and I misstated the equality above, it specifies that the div(curlA)=0 then it has continuous second-order derivatives.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K