Stokes' Theorem formula question

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
aimee3
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
eq0002M.gif


I was wondering, how you break down dS to something with dA? I know that dS is equal to ndS. The n is equal to grad f / (magnitude of grad f) and the dS is equal to the same as the magnitude of grad f right? So is the formula the same as double integral of region D (curl F * grad f) dA?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what f is (as opposed to F), but yes, that should be it.
(A comes from area, while S comes from surface - it is basically the same)
 
aimee3 said:
eq0002M.gif


I was wondering, how you break down dS to something with dA? I know that dS is equal to ndS. The n is equal to grad f / (magnitude of grad f) and the dS is equal to the same as the magnitude of grad f right? So is the formula the same as double integral of region D (curl F * grad f) dA?

Let's say you parameterize your surface S in terms of u and v as

[tex]\vec R = \vec R(u,v)[/tex]

Now since

[tex]dS = |\vec R_u\times \vec R_v|dudv[/tex]
and
[tex]\hat n =\pm\frac{\vec R_u\times\vec R_v}{|\vec R_u\times\vec R_v|}[/tex]
with the sign chosen to agree with the orientation of the surface, you have
[tex]d\vec S =\hat n dS =\pm\frac{\vec R_u\times\vec R_v}{|\vec R_u\times\vec R_v|}<br /> |\vec R_u\times\vec R_v|dudv=\pm\vec R_u\times \vec R_vdudv[/tex]
This allows you to express everything in terms of u and v with appropriate uv limits.