I Stored magnetic energy of solenoid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the stored magnetic energy in a solenoid, specifically the interpretation of the second integral and the vector potential A. The total energy is expressed as (1/2μ_0)∫B²dV, which is split into regions containing the solenoid and the surrounding space. By applying vector calculus identities and Ampere’s equation, the relationship between the magnetic field B and the vector potential A is clarified. The simplification shows that outside the solenoid, where there is no current, the integral can be related to the boundary contributions of the regions. This leads to the conclusion that the total magnetic energy can be calculated by combining contributions from both regions.
Szecska8
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
In my electrodynamics class there was a problem where self-inductance was calculated from the stored magnetic energy of the solenoid, which was calculated with the equation below.
Screenshot (62).png

Can someone explain to me what the second integral represents and what is A?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually alphabet A is used for vector potential which generates magnetic field,
\nabla \times \mathbf{A}=\mathbf{B}
 
The answer I got on reddit, that helped me understand it.

The total energy is given by

(1/2μ_0)∫B2dV

where the integral is taken over all space. Let us now split the space into a region X which contains the solenoid, and a region Y which is everything else. We can now write the integral as

∫B2dV=∫_X B2dV + ∫_Y B2dV

If you start from the vector calculus identity

∇•(AxB)=B•(∇xA)-A•(∇xB)

then insert the definition

∇xA=B

and Ampere’s equation

∇xB=μ_0j

which will be valid assuming static fields, you get

∇•(AxB)=B2-μ_0Aj

Outside the solenoid where there is zero current this simplifies to just

∇•(AxB)=B2

so by Gauss’ theorem we must have

∫_Y B2dV=∮_∂Y (AxB)•dS

Now the boundary ∂Y can be split into two contributions. The first is the boundary at infinity which does not contribute to the integral because the fields decay to zero sufficiently quickly. The second is the boundary shared with region X. This is exactly the same as the boundary of X with the exception that on ∂X the unit normal is oriented in the opposite direction since unit normals always point outwards. Thus

∮_∂Y (AxB)•dS=-∮_∂X (AxB)•dS

and therefore

∫B2dV=∫_X B2dV -∮_∂X (AxB)•dS
 
  • Like
Likes TSny and vanhees71
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top