Strange definition of regularization of Operators

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a formula related to the regularization of operators, specifically the expression lnA= \frac{d^{n}}{ds^{n}} \frac{s^{n-1}}{n! A^{s}}. Participants are exploring its origins, validity in different theoretical contexts, and implications for renormalizable and non-renormalizable theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the origin of the formula and its applicability to renormalizable and non-renormalizable theories.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for proper citation of sources to provide context for the formula.
  • A later reply provides a specific source for the formula, referencing a book by E. Elizalde.
  • There is a note on the significance of the limit as s approaches 0 in the context of the formula.
  • One participant suggests that formally differentiating with respect to A could help verify the identity presented in the formula.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of citation and the interpretation of the formula's components, indicating that multiple perspectives exist without a clear consensus on its implications.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions of parameters and the conditions under which the formula is valid, particularly in relation to divergences in theoretical frameworks.

mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
surfing the web and arxiv i found the strange formula

lnA= \frac{d^{n}}{ds^{n}} \frac{s^{n-1}}{n! A^{s}}

my question is .. where does this formula come from ??

here 'n' is supposed to be a finite parameter we must define to avoid the divergences, is it valid for non-renormalizable or renormalizable theories ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mhill said:
surfing the web and arxiv i found the strange formula

Whenever you want to do something like this, you must make a full citation of the source to put this into a proper context. Or else this may not make any sense.

Zz.
 
The -\lim_{s\to 0} out in front is important.
 
Formally taking a derivative wrt to A on both sides should prove the identity to you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K