Strength of Magnetic Field Without Gaussmeter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on methods to measure the strength of a magnetic field without a gaussmeter, specifically using an axially magnetized neodymium magnet. Participants confirm the viability of using the law of inverse squares and compass needle deflection as effective techniques for relative field strength measurement. The method outlined in the referenced article is deemed suitable, provided the magnet's pole is centered on the measuring device, which may need to be over 1 meter for accuracy. Concerns about sensitivity and accuracy with stronger magnets are acknowledged but not deemed prohibitive.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetism principles
  • Familiarity with the law of inverse squares
  • Knowledge of compass needle deflection techniques
  • Basic concepts of magnetic shielding materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for measuring magnetic field strength using compass deflection
  • Explore the properties of axially magnetized neodymium magnets
  • Study the effects of magnetic shielding alloys on field measurements
  • Investigate alternative techniques for measuring magnetic fields without a gaussmeter
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or materials science, hobbyists interested in magnetism, and researchers exploring non-invasive methods for measuring magnetic fields.

The_Aviator
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm a senior in high school trying to learn more about magnetism and magnetic shielding outside of my classes (I'm pursuing a degree in Materials Sciences at Penn State beginning this fall). I have been trying to determine a way to make a quantitative measure of a magnetic field's strength without a gaussmeter. One method I am considering can be found here:
http://www.frontiernet.net/~jlkeefer/magstren.htm

Can anyone verify if this method will be effective if I am using an axially magnetized neodymium magnet as opposed to a bar magnet as specified in these directions? I would also like to measure the field's strength with a shielding alloy. My concern is that this method will not be accurate enough to provide me with good results or the compass will be too sensitive to a magnet of this strength, though the magnet is just the size of a dime.

Also, if anyone knows of any other methods to determine magnetic field strength without a gaussmeter I would like to know.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the law of inverse squares to determine the field strength seems very reasonable to me. Since the magnitude of the Earth's magnetic poles are known, using the Earth's magnetic field as a reference, again, seems very reasonable to me. Using the deflection of a compass needle offers a great way to accurately measure the relative field strength. So, yes, I think this method sounds well thought out and viable.

As long as you center the magnet's pole on your measuring device, I see no reason the method won't work. You may have to use a measuring device in excess of 1 meter, but that is a fairly trivial modification.

Fish
 
Using the law of inverse squares to determine the field strength seems very reasonable to me. Since the magnitude of the Earth's magnetic poles are known, using the Earth's magnetic field as a reference, again, seems very reasonable to me. Using the deflection of a compass needle offers a great way to accurately measure the relative field strength. So, yes, I think this method sounds well thought out and viable.

As long as you center the magnet's pole on your measuring device, I see no reason the method won't work. You may have to use a measuring device in excess of 1 meter, but that is a fairly trivial modification.

Fish
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 198 ·
7
Replies
198
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K