Stress and strain. young modulus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating changes in dimensions (AB, AD, and AC) under stress using the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio. The initial approach utilized the equation \(\sigma_{xx} = E \cdot \epsilon_{xx}\) for uniaxial loading, which was inadequate for the 2-D and 3-D loading scenarios presented. The correct method involves applying the equations for plane stress and strain, specifically \(\epsilon_{xx} = \frac{\sigma_{xx}}{E} - \frac{\nu}{E} \cdot \sigma_{yy}\) and \(\epsilon_{yy} = \frac{\sigma_{yy}}{E} - \frac{\nu}{E} \cdot \sigma_{xx}\). The discussion concludes that understanding the transformation of strains and stresses is crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's modulus (E) and Poisson's ratio (\(\nu\))
  • Familiarity with stress and strain concepts in materials science
  • Knowledge of plane stress and plane strain equations
  • Basic trigonometry for angle transformations in stress analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of plane stress and plane strain equations
  • Learn about the Generalized Hooke's Law for multi-dimensional stress states
  • Explore numerical methods for solving complex stress-strain problems
  • Investigate software tools like ANSYS or MATLAB for finite element analysis of stress
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, materials scientists, and students studying solid mechanics who require a deeper understanding of stress-strain relationships in multi-dimensional loading scenarios.

Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
in the following question, how do i find the changle in AB, the change in AD and the change in AC?

http://lh4.ggpht.com/_H4Iz7SmBrbk/Sv_hYT83rYI/AAAAAAAAB8s/7l5YRXMxVfQ/s912/Capture.JP what i have done is used the following
\sigmaxx=E*\epsilonxx

\deltaAB=\epsilonAB*AB
since AB is on the x axis,
\epsilonAB=\epsilonxx=\sigmaxx/E=150000000/200000000000=3/400

\deltaAB=\epsilonAB*AB=(3/400)*100*10^-5=75\mum
but, 1st of all this is wrong! the correct answer is meant to be 60\mum, and second of all it seems too simple, why would \nu=0.3 be given if i don't use it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation \sigma=E\epsilon only applies to uniaxial loading of a long, thin object (like a rod or a beam). Do you know of a more general equation for 2-D or 3-D loading configurations?

(This http://john.maloney.org/Papers/Generalized%20Hooke%27s%20Law%20%283-12-07%29.pdf" about stresses, strains, and constitutive equations may be helpful.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dont think so, what equation can i use?
 
Did you look at the link? Let me put it this way: strain in a certain direction can arise from a load in that direction, but it can also arise from lateral contraction caused by a load in another direction. Know what I mean?
 
Dell said:
in the following question, how do i find the changle in AB, the change in AD and the change in AC?

what i have done is used the following
\sigmaxx=E*\epsilonxx

\deltaAB=\epsilonAB*AB


Maples is right.
You should be using the equations for PLANE stress/strain and not AXIAL stress/strain. For axial strain ONLY, you would solve \epsilonxx=\sigmaxx/E.

For plane strain, use
\epsilonxx=\sigmaxx/E - \upsilon/E*\sigmayy
and comparably
\epsilonyy=\sigmayy/E - \upsilon/E*\sigmaxx.

When you [positively] load a member in direction x, it elongates in that direction. In order to hold the volume of the material constant**, the object will "thin" in the other two directions y and z. The amount that they thin is described by Poisson's Ratio \upsilon.
**Note: The volume of the material can change slightly, but for loading within the normal range of the material's limits, the change will be imperceptible.

Hope this gets you on your way.
 
okay got is, hookes law right??
 
for questions a and b it worked perfectly since AB and AD lie on the X and Z axes and i have all the info i need for them, for c) i need to find the change in the length in AC which is on a differend axis system, let's call it n-y-t. now i know that the angle between them is 53.12 (atan(100/75) ) but i want the other angle,- 90+53.13 since i want the strain which goes along AC and i have the transformations equations for stress/strains
so i looked for the strain\epsilont

\epsilont=\epsilonx*cos2(143.13)+\epsilonz*sin2(143.13)=2.86*10-4

\deltaAB=\epsilont*AB=2.86*10-4*125*10-3=35.75\mum
which is way off, anyone see where I am going wrong?
 
Instead of messing around with different coordinate systems, why not just look at the hypotenuse of the right triangle?
 
i learned that that wouldn't work since these are not vectors, but i figured it out anyways, i was using the wrong angle.

(looking at the answers pythagoras won't work here --> 60^2+20.6^2 is not 60.4^2)
 
  • #10
I'm talking about the hypotenuse of the strained lengths: the hypotenuse of 100.060mm and 75.0206mm is 125.0604mm.
 
  • #11
nice
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K