Stress/strain concentration in shear loadings

AI Thread Summary
In a pure shear loading scenario involving a rectangle transitioning to a parallelogram, the finite element analysis (FEA) results indicate unexpected stress and strain concentrations at the bottom corners, despite the expectation of uniform deformation. These concentrations are identified as singularities, raising questions about their occurrence solely at the bottom corners. The fixed boundary condition at the bottom is intended to prevent rigid body motion, yet it appears to influence the stress distribution. The discussion seeks clarification on the normalcy of these singularities and methods to mitigate them. Understanding these phenomena is crucial for accurate modeling in shear loading scenarios.
feynman1
Messages
435
Reaction score
29
A rectangle (plane strain/stress) is sheared on 3 edges (bottom fixed) so that it becomes a parallelogram. In theory this is pure shear and should undergo uniform deformation throughout the domain. The FEA result for this pure shear loading still shows stress/strain concentration on the bottom corners. Is that normal and how to get rid of them?
1623040985456.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Arjan82 said:
These corners are singularities
Why should there be such singularities only on the bottom? In theory (uniform solution) the bottom corners aren't any different from the other 2 vertices. The fixed bottom is just the FEA boundary condition to prevent rigid body motions.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
Carburetor CFM A Holley Carb rated at 500 cfm 2 barrel carb has venturi diameter of 1.3/8". There are 2 barrel carbs with 600 cfm and have 1.45 diameter venturi. Looking at the area the 1.378 bore has 5.9 sq. Inch area. The 1.45 dia. has 6.6 sq. inch. 5.9 - 6.6 = 0.70 sq. inch difference. Keeping the 500 cfm carb in place, if I can introduce 0.7 sq inch more area in the intake manifold, will I have the same potential horsepower as a 600 cfm carb provide? Assume I can change jetting to...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top