Bending shear stress distribution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the shear stress distribution in a cantilever rectangular beam subjected to a vertical shear load. Participants explore the unexpected curved shear stress distribution across the beam's width, contrasting it with theoretical expectations of a uniform distribution. The conversation includes modeling techniques, numerical results, and the implications of material properties such as Poisson's ratio.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant modeled a cantilever beam and observed a parabolic shear stress distribution, which was not uniform across the width as expected.
  • Another participant noted that the parabolic shear stress formula assumes a uniform distribution, questioning the range of shear stresses at the neutral axis compared to hand calculations.
  • A participant reported shear stress values at the neutral axis ranging from 5.15 at the center to 8.07 at the ends, while calculating a theoretical maximum shear stress of 6.25 based on the applied load.
  • Discussion included the effects of corners and edges on shear stress distribution, with one participant suggesting that shear stress can be ignored in long cantilever designs.
  • Another participant introduced the idea that Poisson's ratio might influence the shear stress distribution, noting that setting it to zero resulted in a uniform vertical shear stress across the width and zero horizontal shear stress.
  • One participant compared the results from the simulation with zero Poisson's ratio to the theoretical value of 6.25, finding it to be 6.12 at the neutral axis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of shear stress distribution in the beam, with some agreeing on the influence of Poisson's ratio while others remain uncertain about its implications. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the reasons behind the observed shear stress distribution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the beam's width is not small, suggesting that the cross-section behaves like a plane strain condition rather than plane stress, which introduces complexity in understanding the shear stress behavior.

piygar
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I modeled a simple cantilever rectangular beam in Patran of (L,W,H = 100, 6, 4) with Hexa8 elements and applied a vertical shear load (upwards) of some magnitude at the free end.
Ran in Nastran and plotted the vertical shear stress distribution on a cross-section in middle of length (in order to avoid any boundary condition effects). which is parabolic as expected being zero at top and bottom edges and maximum at center.
But shear stress distribution is not uniform across width. I was expecting rectangular bands parallel to horizontal edges but i get curved bands across widths. what could be the reason of that?
Have attached the fringe plot of vertical shear stress distribution.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    4.2 KB · Views: 602
Engineering news on Phys.org
The parabolic shear stress formula VQ/It assumes a uniform shear stress distribution along the width. The computer shows otherwise. What sort of a range of shear stresses do you get along the width at say the neutral axis? How do the values compare to the hand calculation?
 
Shear stress at neutral axis along the width varies from 5.15 at the center to 8.07 at the either end of the width.
Have inserted fringe plot with spectrum.
I applied 100 unit shear load at the cantilever tip so according to formula max shear stress at center should be 1.5* 100/(6*4) = 6.25

Capture.PNG
 
piygar said:
Shear stress at neutral axis along the width varies from 5.15 at the center to 8.07 at the either end of the width.
Have inserted fringe plot with spectrum.
I applied 100 unit shear load at the cantilever tip so according to formula max shear stress at center should be 1.5* 100/(6*4) = 6.25

View attachment 98605
Thanks for the data. Funny things happen at edges and corners and when beams are not narrow. Anyway, the 6.25 seems like a good weighted average. With the addition of a good catch-all safety factor, of course! Unless the cantilever is of short length, shear doesn't add much in comparison to bending stresses, and I've always ignored it in long cantilever designs using steel.
 
Thanks for reply. Wanted to understand the corners/edges effect clearly.
Also plotted the horizontal shear stress (due to vertical shear load!) on the same cross-section and got this.

Capture1.PNG

Horizontal shear is small but not numeric zero.
Discussed with a colleague and suspicion pointed to Poisson's ratio. Ran another simulation with Poisson ratio = zero and voila, Vertical shear stress is constant across width, and zero horizontal shear stress due to vertical shear load.
Since width of beam is not small,came to understanding that cross-section behaving like a plane strain condition instead of plane stress.
Though plane strain condition should produce secondary normal stress, not shear stress.
 
When you set Poisson's ratio equal to 0 and got uniform stress distribution across the width, how did the result compare to the VQ/It shear stress 6.25 value at the neutral axis?
 
It comes 6.12 at the neutral axis with zero Poisson ratio.
(Tried with higher order Hexa, Hexa20 elements and got same result, as i had shear locking effect in mind)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K