Striaght Line Charge of Finite Length (E Field)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field (E field) at an arbitrary point in space due to a straight line charge of finite length \( l \) with total charge \( Q \) in air. The key equation derived is \(\vec{E} = \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}ld} \left( \int_{\theta_{1}} ^{\theta_{2}} \cos\theta d\theta \hat{i} - \int_{\theta_{1}} ^{\theta_{2}} \sin\theta d\theta \hat{k} \right)\). The confusion arises regarding the origin of the \( ld \) term in the denominator and the vector representation of \(\hat{R}\). Additionally, there is a clarification needed on the range of angles \(\theta_{1}\) and \(\theta_{2}\) and their respective signs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and vector calculus
  • Knowledge of trigonometric relationships in physics
  • Basic concepts of charge distribution and field lines
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about vector calculus applications in electromagnetism
  • Explore the concept of line integrals in physics
  • Review trigonometric identities and their applications in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding electric fields generated by charge distributions.

jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3
Straight Line Charge of Finite Length (E Field)

Homework Statement



Find the expression for the E field at an arbitrary point in space due to a straight line of length l uniformly charged with total charge Q. The ambient medium is air.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am following this example with the solution given in my textbook and I am confused about one part.

He somehow makes the following transition,

[itex]\vec{E} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \int_{l} \frac{Q^{'}dl}{R^{2}} \hat{R} = \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_{0}ld} \left( \int_{\theta_{1}} ^{\theta_{2}} cos\theta d\theta \hat{i} - \int_{\theta_{1}} ^{\theta_{2}} sin\theta d\theta \hat{k} \right)[/itex]

Where does the ld in the denominator come from? We can conclude from the trig relationships that,

[itex]\frac{1}{R^{2}} = \frac{d\theta}{dz} \frac{1}{d}[/itex]

which can account for the d in the denonminator, is it supposed to be that,

[itex]l = \frac{dz}{d\theta}[/itex] ?

Also, how did he devise, [itex]\hat{R} = cos\theta \hat{i} - sin\theta \hat{k}[/itex] in the first place? Where does he get this from?

He also mentions that [itex]\theta[/itex] ranges from [itex]\theta_{1}[/itex] to [itex]\theta_{2}[/itex], but [itex]\theta_{1}[/itex] is moving in the counterclockwise fashion, thus shouldn't we conclude [itex]\theta_{1} > 0[/itex] and for [itex]\theta_{2}[/itex] moving in a clockwise fashion, [itex]\theta_{2} < 0[/itex]? He's got these reversed(like in the figure attached), so what am I mixing up?
 

Attachments

  • EX1.8.JPG
    EX1.8.JPG
    56.4 KB · Views: 459
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm still looking for help one this one!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K