String Theory and Spacetime - Some Questions

In summary, String Theory is a quantum gravity theory that explains other particles and fields, including gravitons, as well as the concept of spacetime. In perturbative string theory, spacetime appears as a background on which strings move and as gravitons, an excited state of a string. In non-perturbative string theory, like AdS/CFT, spacetime can emerge from non-spacetime quantities. The concept of time in String Theory is described through the state-operator map and the use of vertex operators, and the theory also constrains the number of spacetime dimensions. However, the issue of background independence remains a central problem in quantum gravity and may require a new understanding of the concept of gravitons.
  • #1
inflector
344
2
From what I've read, String Theory is a theory of everything, unlike some of the other quantum gravity theories. That means that String Theory explains other particles and fields including gravitons. So String Theory is a quantum gravity theory because it includes gravitons.

But I was wondering, what is spacetime in String Theory? Does it exist as a separate entity? Is there some special gravitational gauge field?

Or does the GR concept of spacetime not appear in String Theory?

How does the concept of time appear in String Theory? Is it like quantum mechanics or GR or something completely different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In perturbative string theory, spacetime appears in two ways. First, as a background on which strings move. For string theory to be consistent, this background must be a solution of general relativity. Secondly, as a graviton, which is an excited state of a string. This would seem schizophrenic, except that a coherent state of gravitons (the second sense of spacetime) is a background spacetime (the first sense of spacetime). There is a discussion of this following Eq 7.1 of http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0333: "Although it’s obvious that (7.1) describes strings moving in curved spacetime, there’s something a little fishy about just writing it down. The problem is that the quantization of the closed string already gave us a graviton."

In some forms of non-perturbative string theory, like AdS/CFT, some parts of a higher dimensional spacetime are "emergent" from non-spacetime quantities in a theory with a lower dimensional spacetime. Try section 5.3 of http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0601234, or figure 1 of http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.0518.

An interesting reference which talks about spacetimes emerging from entangling two different quantum systems can be found in section 3 of http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.2939: "In this section, we will argue that quantum entanglement between the non-perturbative degrees of freedom corresponding to different parts of spacetime plays a critical role in connecting up the emergent spacetime."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
I found the lectures of David Tong very useful. What one can do is to write down the Polyakov action in a general curved spacetime background. But ofcourse, just as a laserbeam is made out of photons, this spacetime should be made out of gravitons.

Now, on the worldsheet one has conformal symmetry (this is needed for instance in order to identify the original ansatz, the Nambu-Goto action, with the Polyakov action which is quantizable). Conformal symmetries have a map called the "state-operator map". This map tells you that the states of the CFT are in 1-1 correspondence with the local operators in the theory. This enables you to describe graviton states via local operators called vertex operators.

Now the funny thing is that one can show that the generalization of the Polyakov action to curved spacetime backgrounds can be seen as the extension of the flat spacetime action to the curved spacetime action via inserting these graviton vertex operators.

The nice thing about string theory is that it constraints spacetime, but ofcourse one first has to assume there exists something like that. If you do that, properties like the number of spacetime dimensions follow. From the CFT point of view for instance, in the bosonic case gauge fixing occurs via ghost fields (a trick to gauge fix and preserve Lorentz invariance also used in QFT). These ghost fields contribute -26 to the central charge. However, the Weyl anomaly (quantum effects which treathen to spoil conformal invariance on the world sheet) is proportional to the total central charge and should be zero. The solution is to add 26 scalar fields X with central charge 1 each: the 26 spacetime dimensions.

Another way to see this need for D=26 dimensions is via lightcone quantization; the Lorentz algebra has to be preserved after quantization, and one of the Lorentz commutators is asking you then to put D=26.

Hope this helps :)
 
  • #5
Thanks atyy and haushofer. I'll read those references over.
 
  • #6
Inflector,

I think that there is one central issue with many approaches of quantum gravity, namely background independence. Starting with a split of spacetime into a classical (fixed) background and some fluctuations (gravitons) on top of if will fail in many cases. Ordinary gravity / GR cannot be quantized in that way; it fails to be perturbatively renormalizable, i.e. the theory will lose its predictive power. The situation seems to be better in string theory and possibly maximal 4d SUGRA which could be finite order by order in perturbation theory - which does not mean that the perturbation series itself does converge (there are reasons to assume that it diverges). So even in string theory and SUGRA this lack of background independence is a central issue.

I think it's rather trivial that splitting spacetime into a background plus fluctuations on top of this background plus quantization of the fluctuations prevents us from understanding the background in terms of these fluctuations. This does not only apply for quantum gravity but even for ordinary quantum field theories. So what one needs is a theory that allows one to quantize gravity w/o introducing this artificial split - and that goes beyond perturbation theory. I think this is accepted in all main approaches for quantum gravity.

But that automatically means that the concept of gravitons will change. They are no longer small fluctuations on some background but they are the full dynamical degrees of the gravitational field. There are some approaches working along these approaches: LQG, CDT (as a computational tool), AS (don't confuse the background method used in AS with fixing a background; here the idea is to keep the background generic) and some approaches within string theory (especially AdS/CFT).

Succeeding with this non-perturbative, background independent quantization will automatically explain what spacetime "is at the fundamental level.
 

1. What is string theory?

String theory is a theoretical framework in physics that attempts to explain the fundamental nature of particles and their interactions. It proposes that the universe is made up of tiny, vibrating strings rather than point-like particles.

2. How does string theory relate to spacetime?

String theory suggests that spacetime, the four-dimensional fabric of the universe, is not a fixed background but rather a dynamic structure that is influenced by the vibrations of strings. In this theory, spacetime is not a fundamental concept but emerges from the interactions of strings.

3. Is string theory a proven theory?

No, string theory has not been proven and is still a subject of ongoing research and debate. It is a complex and highly mathematical theory that has yet to be tested through experiments. However, it has shown promise in providing a unified framework for understanding the fundamental forces of nature.

4. What are some of the challenges with string theory?

One of the main challenges with string theory is that it currently lacks experimental evidence. Additionally, the theory requires the existence of extra dimensions and introduces new mathematical concepts that are difficult to visualize and understand.

5. Can string theory be reconciled with other theories, such as general relativity?

Yes, string theory attempts to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity, which are two of the most fundamental theories in physics. However, the theory is still in its early stages and there is ongoing research to find a complete and consistent version of string theory that is compatible with all other known theories.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
26
Views
428
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
862
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top