String Theory: Understanding Superstring Theory and Its Location

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter redhedkangaro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    String Superstring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the understanding of string theory, specifically superstring theory, and inquiries about the nature and origin of fundamental strings. Participants explore theoretical aspects, historical context, and the implications of string theory in relation to particles and fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether string theory posits that everything in the universe consists of different vibrating states of a single fundamental superstring.
  • Another participant clarifies that superstring theory refers to the inclusion of supersymmetry, which relates fermions and bosons, and emphasizes that there are multiple strings rather than just one.
  • A further contribution states that string theory suggests particles are not pointlike but rather extended objects, indicating that each elementary particle corresponds to a small string.
  • Questions arise regarding the origin of these strings, with one participant asking if they emerge from a field similar to particles.
  • A historical perspective is provided, noting that the concept of vibrating strings has roots in earlier atomic models and suggesting that string theory may be a natural extension of quantum field theory.
  • Another participant mentions that the idea of using strings to explain hadrons was promising before the development of quantum chromodynamics (QCD), indicating a historical evolution in the understanding of particle physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of strings and their implications in physics. There is no consensus on the specifics of string theory or its origins, and the discussion reflects multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on historical interpretations and the evolution of theoretical models, which may not be universally accepted or fully resolved within the current understanding of physics.

redhedkangaro
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if my understanding of string theory was right and if not could someone please correct me.

1.)Is string theory saying that everytrhing in the universe is different vibrating states of one fundamental superstring.

2.) Where is this superstring located?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it is called superstring theory since the theory provides supersymmetry (symmetry between fermions and bosons) - i.e. superstring theory is short hand of Supersymmetric String Theory
 
redhedkangaro said:
I was wondering if my understanding of string theory was right and if not could someone please correct me.

1.)Is string theory saying that everytrhing in the universe is different vibrating states of one fundamental superstring.

2.) Where is this superstring located?
No, string theory says that particles are not really pointlike objects, but objects slightly extended in one dimension. There is no only one string in the universe, but many of them - each elementary particle is actually a little string.
 
Thanks that helps a lot. Do scientist know where these strings come from, do they arise from a field like particles or...
 
redhedkangaro said:
Do scientist know where these strings come from, do they arise from a field like particles or...
Are you asking which facts suggested historically the string hypothesis ?

First, the very idea that things are made of vibrating string is fairly old. I think you can easily go back to before we knew even what atoms are. I have vague memories of 19th century models of atoms as knotted objects.

Second, one could argue that it is a natural generalization of quantum field theory of particles. Generally speaking, a particle is a 0 dimensional object. If you have difficulties to construct a consistent theory of 0 dimensional objects, you may want to even try what happens with object of larger dimensions, starting with 1. You would find out that you need to include also other kind of higher dimensional structures, such as branes.

Third, before the advent of QCD there was around the idea that hadrons could be better explained in terms of strings. That was a very promising idea. It met with difficulties around the same time as QCD was understood, but later people realized they could still use it to construct elegant unified models.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K