(Structural Analysis) Moment Distribution Method: Help?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the Moment Distribution Method for structural analysis, specifically regarding the determination of stiffness factors. There is confusion over the appropriate stiffness factor to use for fixed and pinned ends, with conflicting information from various sources. One suggested approach is to consistently use 4EI/L for all members, though this may require multiple iterations in the moment distribution process. Alternatively, the modified stiffness method allows for using 3EI/L for spans with a pin, simplifying calculations. The thread highlights the importance of understanding the context of each problem to apply the correct stiffness factors effectively.
Khamul
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, as the thread title implies, I'm in a bit of a bind when it comes to understanding the Moment Distribution Method for displacement methods of analysis.

In particular, I am having a lot of trouble in determining Stiffness Factors. I have attempted to browse my book and online for clarification, but I feel like every source I look at contradicts the other.

For example...page two and page three of this pdf:
http://www.sut.ac.th/engineering/civil/courseonline/430332/pdf/04_MomentDistribution.pdf

It states that if the far end member is fixed, then the stiffness factor, K, is K=4EI/L. Okay.
But page 4 of this pdf then goes on to state that K(ab) = 3EI/L, even though the far end D on this is fixed.

Could someone please help me make sense of this? :(
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
1) You can always use 4EI/L for all members. If you choose to do this, then the moment distribution process will be a bit longer and you will have to repeatedly "carry-over" the moments back and forth until they become small enough ("small enough" is based on your own judgement).

2) Alternatively, you can use the "modified stiffness" moment distribution method. In this case, one way to do it for your beam is to observe that there is a pin at the end of one of the spans. This means that you can choose to use 3EI/L for that span. Leave the other spans as 4EI/L. The advantage, in general, of using a "modified stiffness" is that you only "carry-over" the moments one-time.

It is unfortunate that the beam in question is not solved by either method 1) or 2) in your attached file, even though they mention both of these methods on pg 2, pg 3, as you mentioned (or did I just miss it?). Nevertheless, it appears that they solve a variety of problems later on...

Note the beam on pg 7, for example -- Here, they use a modified stiffness factor for all 3 spans. They get the 2EI/L by observing "symmetry" in the first span. This problem is solved in one step, but it is a simpler problem. Later on, in other examples, 6EI/L pops up, which is the modified stiffness factor for "anti-symmetry."


I've attached my own notes on the subject. It's only 8 pages, and would probably be worth your time if you are still "in a bind." It is adapted from "Elementary Theory of Structures" by Hsieh and Mau. Back when I learned this stuff that was the best text on the subject. I think Hibbeler has since gotten in on the action.
 

Attachments

What mathematics software should engineering students use? Is it correct that much of the engineering industry relies on MATLAB, making it the tool many graduates will encounter in professional settings? How does SageMath compare? It is a free package that supports both numerical and symbolic computation and can be installed on various platforms. Could it become more widely used because it is freely available? I am an academic who has taught engineering mathematics, and taught the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K