Moment distibution (stiffness factor modifications) for a frame

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 4K views
fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For the KAb and KCD , they are connected by the same method ... At B and C , we can see that they are connected by the same method , although i am not sure it's fixed or pinned .

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I assume they are fixed at B and C , so i agree that KAB is 4EI / L for far end fixed case . So , i think KCD should be 4EI / L as well .
 

Attachments

  • 531.PNG
    531.PNG
    58.6 KB · Views: 1,228
  • 530.PNG
    530.PNG
    53.2 KB · Views: 1,558
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
haruspex said:
Aren't the "far ends" A and D? One is fixed and one is pinned.

B and C are fixed ? How do we know that ? It's not stated in the question
 
fonseh said:
B and C are fixed ? How do we know that ? It's not stated in the question
No, not B and C; A and D. As I read it, the stiffness factor at one end of a beam depends on whether the far end (other end) is fixed or only pinned. That makes intuitive sense to me.
A, B and C are fixed, so for the interactions at B and C:
AB is 4 because A is fixed
BC is 4 at each end because the other end is fixed
CD is 3 because D is pinned
CE is 3 because E is pinned
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
haruspex said:
BC is 4 at each end because the other end is fixed
Which end is fixed ? B or C ?
 
haruspex said:
Both are "fixed". (I think this just means it's a rigid joint, not a hinge.)
But hey, I'm only inferring all this from the text.
You just assume they are fixed ? So , for this type of question , we just assume they are always fixed ?? Since the author didnt show how's the connection at B and C
 
fonseh said:
You just assume they are fixed ? So , for this type of question , we just assume they are always fixed ?? Since the author didnt show how's the connection at B and C
I'm not sure how you were supposed to know. They certainly look rigid in the drawing, but then so do D and E.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
S
haruspex said:
I'm not sure how you were supposed to know. They certainly look rigid in the drawing, but then so do D and E.
Since they look ' rigid' , so they are assumed to be fixed at B and C ?
 
fonseh said:
S

Since they look ' rigid' , so they are assumed to be fixed at B and C ?
I might have it...

The question of "far end fixed" is to do with sideways flexing at the "near end" being inhibited by the far end.
At the top of CD, sideways movement of C is not resisted by the joint D since that is a hinge.
At the top of AB, sideways movement of B is resisted by the joint at A.
In the beam BC, vertical movement at B is resisted by the combination of the rigidity of BCE and constraints at D and E. C cannot move up or down because of D. The rigidity of BCE then inhibits vertical movement at B.
Similarly, vertical movement at C is resisted by the combination of the rigidity of BCE and constraints at AB and E. B cannot move up or down because of A.

Hope that makes sense.