Moment distibution (stiffness factor modifications) for a frame

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the stiffness factors for a frame structure, specifically focusing on the connections at points B and C, and whether they are fixed or pinned. Participants explore the implications of these assumptions on the calculations of stiffness factors KAB and KCD.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assume that B and C are fixed, leading to the conclusion that KAB and KCD should both be calculated as 4EI / L.
  • Others question the assumption of B and C being fixed, pointing out that the problem statement does not explicitly state their conditions.
  • There is a suggestion that the far ends A and D are the ones that are fixed and pinned, respectively, which affects the stiffness calculations.
  • One participant infers that the rigidity of the joints at B and C can be assumed based on their appearance in the drawing, though this is not universally accepted.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of the far end being fixed, explaining how it affects the movement and constraints at the joints.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether B and C are fixed or pinned, with multiple competing views on the interpretation of the problem statement and the rigidity of the connections.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights uncertainties regarding the assumptions made about the connections at B and C, and the lack of explicit information in the problem statement regarding their conditions. This leads to varying interpretations of the stiffness factors.

fonseh
Messages
521
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For the KAb and KCD , they are connected by the same method ... At B and C , we can see that they are connected by the same method , although i am not sure it's fixed or pinned .

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I assume they are fixed at B and C , so i agree that KAB is 4EI / L for far end fixed case . So , i think KCD should be 4EI / L as well .
 

Attachments

  • 531.PNG
    531.PNG
    58.6 KB · Views: 1,208
  • 530.PNG
    530.PNG
    53.2 KB · Views: 1,539
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
fonseh said:
far end fixed
Aren't the "far ends" A and D? One is fixed and one is pinned.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
haruspex said:
Aren't the "far ends" A and D? One is fixed and one is pinned.

B and C are fixed ? How do we know that ? It's not stated in the question
 
fonseh said:
B and C are fixed ? How do we know that ? It's not stated in the question
No, not B and C; A and D. As I read it, the stiffness factor at one end of a beam depends on whether the far end (other end) is fixed or only pinned. That makes intuitive sense to me.
A, B and C are fixed, so for the interactions at B and C:
AB is 4 because A is fixed
BC is 4 at each end because the other end is fixed
CD is 3 because D is pinned
CE is 3 because E is pinned
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
haruspex said:
BC is 4 at each end because the other end is fixed
Which end is fixed ? B or C ?
 
fonseh said:
Which end is fixed ? B or C ?
Both are "fixed". (I think this just means it's a rigid joint, not a hinge.)
But hey, I'm only inferring all this from the text.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
haruspex said:
Both are "fixed". (I think this just means it's a rigid joint, not a hinge.)
But hey, I'm only inferring all this from the text.
You just assume they are fixed ? So , for this type of question , we just assume they are always fixed ?? Since the author didnt show how's the connection at B and C
 
fonseh said:
You just assume they are fixed ? So , for this type of question , we just assume they are always fixed ?? Since the author didnt show how's the connection at B and C
I'm not sure how you were supposed to know. They certainly look rigid in the drawing, but then so do D and E.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fonseh
S
haruspex said:
I'm not sure how you were supposed to know. They certainly look rigid in the drawing, but then so do D and E.
Since they look ' rigid' , so they are assumed to be fixed at B and C ?
 
  • #10
fonseh said:
S

Since they look ' rigid' , so they are assumed to be fixed at B and C ?
I might have it...

The question of "far end fixed" is to do with sideways flexing at the "near end" being inhibited by the far end.
At the top of CD, sideways movement of C is not resisted by the joint D since that is a hinge.
At the top of AB, sideways movement of B is resisted by the joint at A.
In the beam BC, vertical movement at B is resisted by the combination of the rigidity of BCE and constraints at D and E. C cannot move up or down because of D. The rigidity of BCE then inhibits vertical movement at B.
Similarly, vertical movement at C is resisted by the combination of the rigidity of BCE and constraints at AB and E. B cannot move up or down because of A.

Hope that makes sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K