Truss Bridges: Strength Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimmyRay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structure
Click For Summary
Truss bridges derive their strength from the triangular shapes within their structure, which distribute forces effectively. Each member of the truss is supported by two others, creating a stable system that resists deformation. Unlike rectangles, which can collapse under lateral forces without changing side lengths, triangles maintain their shape under stress. This rigidity means that even small changes in angle require significant changes in side lengths, generating strong resistive forces. Therefore, the triangular design is crucial for the structural integrity of truss bridges.
JimmyRay
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
What makes truss bridges so strong? Like if you have something supported by triangles, why is it good? I don't really understand the physics behind it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you must look at the entire structure itself to understand. each member is supported by teo other members whose stress is oppisite the one being supported
 
A truss bridge gains it's strength from the numerous triangular forms contained in it's structure. Were the structural members of the span arranged in rectangles instead of triangles, the bridge would be weak and collapse. This is because in a rectangle, a lateral force can change the angles without changing the lengths of any of the sides (the beams), allowing the rectangle to collapse without any compressive or tension forces to resist the collapse.

But in a triangular object (or I think any other polygon with an odd number of sides - isn't that right?) you cannot change the angles without changing the lengths of the sides. So the beams push back on any force that tries to change their shape. Since the triangle has the least number of angles of any odd sided figure, even a small change in angle would require a large change in side length, resulting in a large resistive force.
 
Bob3141592 said:
But in a triangular object (or I think any other polygon with an odd number of sides - isn't that right?)
Nope. Stick with triangles.

Build a pentagon from straws. You can easily distort its angles without any change in the length of its sides.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K