Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Structure R^k and midpoints of vectors

  1. Sep 8, 2007 #1
    First this is NOT a homework problem. I am undertaking a self-study of mathematical analysis by following Rudin's Principles of Mathematical analysis. I have done a course in analysis before but this is a high-powered review of sorts.

    So I'm currently on the first chapter's problem set and I've gotten stuck on problem 16, which asks:

    Let x,y in R^k, k>/=3 (at least 3-space), norm[x-y] = d>0 prove:

    a)If 2r>d There are infinitely many z in R^k s.t. norm[z-y]=norm[z-x]=r
    b)If 2r=d there is exactly one such z.
    c)If 2r<d there are no such z.

    That is the question as stated, to clarify the norm I speak of is the tradition euclidean k-space norm (i.e. root of sum of squares of components).

    Part a) is the one I've made the least progress on, b) I'm half done and c) is a simple proof by contradiction using the triangle inequality.

    Geometrically (for part a)) consider the line between x and y, there is a perpindicular plane at the midpoint (x+y)/2 (perpendicular to the line connecting x and y) and the set of infinite z that a) asks for is the circle of radius (r^2 - (d/2)^2)^(1/2) which is nonzero b/c of the hypothesis lying on the tangent plane centered at the midpoint (x+y)/2. The thing is, I presume rudin wants me to construct a general z that admits infinitely vectors, but I've found this very difficult to do using the definitions and theorems given in the chapter. Any ideas?

    Part b) the only such z is x+y=2 but I can't for the life of me prove that it is the ONLY solution with rigour.

    Help would be much appreciated.

    Siddharth M.

    PS: obviously the problem I'm having is providing a clean and neat proof strictly using definitions and theorems as is required of an analyst but such a solution has thus far escaped me.
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 10, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    as you know, my advice is to choose some more user friendly book, especially for self study.

    have you drawn a picture in the plane? i.e. for the forbidden k = 2 case?
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2007
  4. Sep 10, 2007 #3
    It's not so much self-study as much as it is a high-powered review. I'm familiar with the theorems in the first 7 chapters, also I've taken a course in measure theory that was significantly more challenging. That being said Rudin is perfect for honing my problem-solving skills while reviewing the essential theorems of the theory.

    I've "drawn" it in 3-space - it's actually fairly easy to picture.

    in the plane the assertions are the same except 2r>d means there are two solutions, on the line you never get a solution unless 2r=d, in which case only the midpoint suffices.

    The only way I can see to do this is using a constructive proof, but my methods have gotten too messy. There needs to be a slicker way of going about this theorem.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?