Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am going through my notes trying to get things straight in my head and something is confusing me. I also have the feeling it will turn out not to be very complicated, which is why I am a bit frustrated with this.

I know that there is something used in general relativity called the Lagrangian, which is given by [tex] L = g_{\nu\mu}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}[/tex], where the dx^{[tex]\mu[/tex]}and dx^{[tex]\nu[/tex]}refer to the coordinates of the chosen coordinate system, and g is the metric, where the subscript refer to elements of the matrix it can be written as.

I also know there is something called the spacetime interval ds. As I understand things, in flat space, we use Cartesian coordinates and we have a metric, which (I think) is called the Minkowski metric:

[-1 0 0 0]

[ 0 1 0 0]

[ 0 0 1 0]

[ 0 0 0 1] and the metric elements and the interval are related by:

[tex] ds^2 = g_\nu_\mu dx^\nu dx^\mu [/tex], where [tex] \mu,\nu = 0,1,2,3 [/tex].

As I understand things, if the spacetime involved was not flat, then these diagonal elements would be different, right?

Then we say that [tex] dx^0 = cdt, dx^1 = dx, dx^2 = dy, & dx^3 = dz [/tex], and noting that if [tex] \nu \neq \mu [/tex] then the corresponding metric coefficients are zero.

this gives us, using Einstein's summation convention, that:

[tex] ds^2 = g_0_0(cdt)(cdt) + g_1_1(dx)(dx) + g_2_2(dy)(dy) + g_3_3(dz)(dz) [/tex]

[tex] = -c^2dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 [/tex].

I understand this as being the separation between 2 events separated by position or time or both.

Then looking back at the Lagrangian equation above, it gives this:

[tex] L = -c^2(\frac{dt}{d\tau})^2 + (\frac{dx}{d\tau})^2 + (\frac{dy}{d\tau})^2 + (\frac{dz}{d\tau})^2 [/tex]

My first question is, what is the interpretation of the Lagrangian exactly? All I have seen in my notes is that it gets stuck into the Euler-Lagrange equation, and sometimes conserved quantities or equations of motion pop out. I remember using the Lagrangian L=T-V in classical mechanics, and I do not see the relationship between the two (nor did I ever really understand what the significance of the difference between kinetic and potential energy was).

Does it really have a physical meaning or is it just some weird mathematical trick I have to blindly use to make equations of motion appear?

The other thing that was making me confused was a part in my notes where the interval/Schwarzschild metric for a particle on a radial trajectory towards a spherical mass was given, using spherical polar coordinates, as:

[tex] ds^2 = -c^2dt^2(1 - \frac{2GM}{rc^2}) + \frac{dr^2}{1-\frac{2GM}{rc^2}} [/tex].

Apparently I am supposed to be able to find a Lagrangian for the particle from this interval, but I don't get what I am supposed to do with it to find this. I am not really even comfortable with the way "interval" and "metric" seem to be interchangeable.

Why then, if the interval is given by [tex] ds^2 = g_\nu_\mu dx^\nu dx^\mu [/tex], is the Lagrangian given by [tex] L = g_{\nu\mu}\frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau}\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}[/tex]? These two things look similar, i mean, there is only a derivative with respect to tau to tell between them, but its clearly not as simple a thing as, say, [tex] L = \frac{ds}{d\tau} [/tex].

Anyone able to set me straight here?

Thanks.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Struggling with the relationship between the Lagrangian L and the interval ds?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**