Struggling with Thermal Physics? Any Suggestions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges participants face in understanding thermal physics. It includes personal experiences with the subject, difficulties in grasping concepts, and the absence of a set textbook for the course.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a consistent struggle with thermal physics compared to other areas of physics, indicating a lack of understanding and difficulty with the material.
  • Another participant shares their exam experience, noting a score that reflects their challenges and suggests that understanding conditions and hypotheses is crucial for success.
  • There is mention of specific topics like Wien's Law and the importance of equations that may not have been adequately covered in class.
  • Some participants agree that while mechanics and E&M have intuitive aspects, thermal physics lacks the same clarity, particularly when dealing with complex applications like Maxwell's relations and Gibbs and Helmholtz free energies.
  • Links to resources are shared, indicating a search for additional materials to aid understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the difficulties associated with thermal physics, but there is no consensus on specific solutions or approaches to overcome these challenges.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention distractions and external factors affecting their study, which may influence their understanding of the material. There are references to overlapping content with calculus, suggesting a potential gap in foundational knowledge.

Who May Find This Useful

Students struggling with thermal physics, educators seeking to understand common student challenges, and individuals looking for study resources in thermal physics may find this discussion relevant.

Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0
I don't know why, but my weak point has always been thermo. I am taking thermal physics and I am finding it difficult. I don't have a problem with Classical Mechanics, E&M. Even quantum I don't find nearly as difficult to DO as thermo. To make things even more difficult, my class does not have a set text. Has anyone else had trouble with thermal physics? I am open to suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I find it myself difficult, I got in my exam 72/118 points, it's interesting and I guess that if I have gone to the second chance exam, I would have got higher grades ,by learning from my mistakes of the past.
But I guess there are some that no matter how, will never get it.
I guess it's all because your'e not always undersatnd the conditions and hypotheses you need to use, either because the lecturer glimpsed over it, or because you were unaware of a simple equation.

I myself photocopied (from a girl! (-: ) some of the material cause it overlapped with calculus 3 and not all of the material was there or at least I couldn't find it,Wien's Law, I can't even remember looking at this equation, and I had something like two weeks to learn for the exam but got distracted from a murdering of a young girl, I'm telling you, watching TV is evil.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
Yes, I find it myself difficult, I got in my exam 72/118 points, it's interesting and I guess that if I have gone to the second chance exam, I would have got higher grades ,by learning from my mistakes of the past.
But I guess there are some that no matter how, will never get it.
I guess it's all because your'e not always undersatnd the conditions and hypotheses you need to use, either because the lecturer glimpsed over it, or because you were unaware of a simple equation.

I myself photocopied (from a girl! (-: ) some of the material cause it overlapped with calculus 3 and not all of the material was there or at least I couldn't find it,Wien's Law, I can't even remember looking at this equation, and I had something like two weeks to learn for the exam but got distracted from a murdering of a young girl, I'm telling you, watching TV is evil.
I agree with you on that one. In mechanics things are intuitive, and I have at least a direction. Some of the intuitive things in mechanics crosses over to E&M. Q&M I can DO(learning from Griffiths). Some of thermo so intuitive, obvious things like like conservation of energy. But when it comes to heavy lifting applications with maxwells relations, gibbs, and helmholz, I am just dead in the water. I still struggle with even some basic thermo stuff!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K