Study: Major Bottled Water Brands Contaminated w/ Plastic

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a study suggesting that major bottled water brands are contaminated with plastic particles. Participants explore the implications of this contamination, its potential health risks, and the reliability of the study's findings. The conversation includes considerations of consumer habits, health concerns, and industry responses.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question what conclusions can be drawn from the study, suggesting that the presence of particles may not indicate harm.
  • There is a discussion about whether the levels of detected particles in bottled water are linked to any health problems, with some asserting that detection does not equate to danger.
  • One participant notes that contamination may stem from bottle caps and raises the possibility of refining processing techniques to reduce particle contamination.
  • Concerns are expressed regarding the unclear extent of health risks associated with plastic contamination, referencing potential links to cancer, lower sperm counts, ADHD, and autism.
  • Industry representatives challenge the study's findings, claiming a lack of peer review and asserting that no significant amount of microplastic has been found in single-use plastic bottles.
  • Jacqueline Savitz from Oceana emphasizes the need to reduce reliance on plastic water bottles, citing the study as further evidence of the issue.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the body's ability to process these particles and whether internal exposure could have negative effects.
  • Some participants highlight the poor quality of tap water in certain areas, suggesting that bottled water remains a necessary option for many consumers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the health implications of plastic contamination in bottled water, with multiple competing views on the reliability of the study and the potential risks involved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying assumptions about the health impacts of microplastics, the reliability of scientific studies, and the necessity of bottled water in certain regions. There are unresolved questions regarding the specific levels of contamination and their health effects.

Physics news on Phys.org
kyphysics said:
What conclusions should we draw?
Not many; you are likely to find particles from a container in the container.
 
Have they shown that the levels they detect in bottled water are associated with any health problems?

Just because you can detect something, doesn't mean it is harmful.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
russ_watters said:
Not many; you are likely to find particles from a container in the container.

Is that true of glass or metal cups too?

In this case, they mentioned it was from the bottle caps, due to how they are processed.

I guess the question is how many particles and if they're dangerous to us in this case. ...Although, I wonder if the processing techniques could just be refined in the future to prevent the particle contamination completely...

Ygggdrasil said:
Have they shown that the levels they detect in bottled water are associated with any health problems?

Just because you can detect something, doesn't mean it is harmful.

That's the big question. From the article, it says:

Experts cautioned that the extent of the risk to human health posed by such contamination remains unclear.

"There are connections to increases in certain kinds of cancer to lower sperm count to increases in conditions like ADHD and autism," said Mason.

"We know that they are connected to these synthetic chemicals in the environment and we know that plastics are providing kind of a means to get those chemicals into our bodies."

- Time to ditch plastic? . . .

However, representatives from the bottled water industry took issue with the findings, saying they were not peer-reviewed and "not based on sound science," according to a statement from the International Bottled Water Association.

"A recent scientific study published in the peer-reviewed journal Water Research in February 2018 concluded that no statistically relevant amount of microplastic can be found in water in single-use plastic bottles," it added.

"There is no scientific consensus on the potential health impacts of microplastic particles. The data on the topic is limited and conclusions differ dramatically from one study to another."

Jacqueline Savitz, chief policy officer for North America at Oceana, a marine advocacy group that was not involved in the research, said the study provides more evidence that society must abandon the ubiquitous use of plastic water bottles.

Looks unclear at the moment.

I figured our bodies would pass the particles through as waste, unless I'm mistaken. But could internal exposure affect us negatively at these particle rates? Looks unclear.

In many parts of the country, tap water is running brown/black/reddish-brown, etc. People would love to have bottled water there. I have no plans to give up bottled water yet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K