Sturm-Louville problem: u'' - u = x, u(0)=u(π)=0.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Sturm-Louville problem defined by the differential equation u'' - u = x with boundary conditions u(0) = u(π) = 0. The adjoint operator of the Sturm-Louville operator, denoted as Ls†, is established through the relationship =. The participant successfully demonstrates that the adjoint operator satisfies Ad{L} = L using integration by parts. Furthermore, it is concluded that the associated homogeneous adjoint problem L*v = 0 has a unique solution under the given boundary conditions, specifically v(x) = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Sturm-Louville theory
  • Familiarity with differential equations, specifically second-order linear ODEs
  • Knowledge of boundary value problems
  • Proficiency in integration by parts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Sturm-Louville operators
  • Learn about the uniqueness and existence theorems for solutions of boundary value problems
  • Explore the method of separation of variables for solving differential equations
  • Investigate the implications of adjoint operators in functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers dealing with differential equations and boundary value problems, particularly those interested in Sturm-Louville theory and its applications.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



screen-capture-5-10.png


Homework Equations



From the lecture notes:

"To study the Sturm-Louiville operator Ls in greater detail, we first need to determine it's adjoint operator, denoted by Ls. [...] The adjoint of the Sturm-Louiville operator satisfies the relationship

<Lsy1,y2>=<y1,Lsy2>,​

where y1 and y2 are two arbitrary functions satisfying the prescribed boundary conditions."

The Attempt at a Solution



I went straight ahead and tried to find the adjoint of the Sturm-Louiville operator. It got really messy, and I'm wondering whether there's something obvious that I'm missing.

screen-capture-6-6.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, the operator Lu=u''-u≠x in general, otherwise there's no need to solve the DE.
Second, the boundary condition u(0)=u(pi)=0 applies to all u, v, w, etc. By letting <Lu,v>=<u,Ad{L}v>, and using integration by parts, it can be shown Ad{L}=L.
 
Got it.

Now the next part says

Solve the associated homogeneous adjoint problem problem L*v = 0 with the same boundary conditions. Show that Lu = u'' - u = x has a unique solutions without actually solving it.

Well, since L*v = Lv = v '' - v, we need to solve v'' - v = 0 with v(0) = v(pi) = 0. Isn't the only solution v(x) = 0, since v '' - v = 0 implies v = C1ex + C2e-x?/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K