Subgroup of Finitely Generated Abelian Group

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that any subgroup of a finitely generated abelian group is finitely generated. The proof strategy involves induction on the number of generators, starting with cyclic groups and extending to finitely generated groups of the form G = \mathbb{Z} a_{1} + ... + \mathbb{Z} a_{n}. A key insight is the application of the correspondence theorem, particularly when considering the quotient group G/\mathbb{Z}a_{n}. The conclusion reached is that if a finitely generated subgroup K exists within an abelian group H, and the quotient H/K is also finitely generated, then H itself is finitely generated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finitely generated abelian groups
  • Knowledge of cyclic groups and their properties
  • Familiarity with the correspondence theorem in group theory
  • Basic concepts of quotient groups
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the structure of finitely generated abelian groups using the Fundamental Theorem of Finitely Generated Abelian Groups
  • Explore the correspondence theorem in greater detail
  • Investigate examples of cyclic groups and their subgroups
  • Learn about the implications of quotient groups in group theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, students studying group theory, and anyone interested in the properties of abelian groups and their substructures.

jumpr
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that any subgroup of a finitely generated abelian group is finitely generated.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I've attempted a proof by induction on the number of generators. The case n=1 corresponds to a cyclic group, and any subgroup of a cyclic group is cyclic, and so generated by one element. Then for the inductive step, I supposed that G was finitely generated, say G = \mathbb{Z} a_{1} + ... + \mathbb{Z} a_{n}, and that the result holds for groups generated by fewer than n elements. I've then let H \le G, and considered the quotient group G/\mathbb{Z}a_{n}, and then hoped that the correspondence theorem would help me out, but so far I can't seem to make it work.

Am I even attacking this problem correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to prove the following general result, it might help:

Let H be an abelian group. If there exists a finitely generated subgroup K of H such that H/K is finitely generated, then H is finitely generated.
 
micromass said:
Try to prove the following general result, it might help:

Let H be an abelian group. If there exists a finitely generated subgroup K of H such that H/K is finitely generated, then H is finitely generated.

Does this work?

Let K \le H be finitely generated where H/K is finitely generated, say K = \mathbb{Z}a_{1} + ... + \mathbb{Z}a_{n} and H/K = \mathbb{Z}(b_{1} + K) + ... + \mathbb{Z}(b_{m} + K) = \mathbb{Z}b_{1} + ... + \mathbb{Z}b_{m} + K, where the b_{i} \in H. Let h \in H, and consider h + K \in H/K. Then h + K = y_{1}b_{1} + ... + y_{m}b_{m} for some y_{i} \in \mathbb{Z}, so y_{1}b_{1} + ... + y_{m}b_{m} - h \in K. But then y_{1}b_{1} + ... + y_{m}b_{m} - h = z_{1}a_{1} + ... + z_{n}a_{n} for some z_{i} \in \mathbb{Z}, and so h = y_{1}b_{1} + ... + y_{m}b_{m} - z_{1}a_{1} - ... - z_{n}a_{n}. Thus, H is finitely generated.
 
Yes, that works!
 
Sorry, I'm going to have to ask for a hint as to where to go from there. My ideas for proofs tend to break down when I want to assume a_{i} \in H for some a_{i}when G = \mathbb{Z}a_{1} + ... + \mathbb{Z}a_{n}.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K